Search for: "Comfort v. Comfort"
Results 301 - 320
of 5,281
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2012, 5:48 am
Without an objective criteria, refusals to allow telecommuting can amount to a discrimination claim, as was the case in the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario case last month of Devaney v ZRV Holdings (2012 HRTO 1590). [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 8:16 am
STARR v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 10:11 pm
One more item about the Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 2:25 pm
Update: I have posted at this link the amicus brief filed on behalf of school children from the City of Lynn, Massachusetts who were the plaintiffs/petitioners in Comfort v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 10:48 am
Joint positions in Canada and the case of R. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 2:44 pm
By Lisa Whittaker Employers who have been concerned about the EEOC’s stance on inflexible maximum leave policies can find some comfort in the Tenth Circuit’s decision in Hwang v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 5:32 am
It's not yet available on BAILII, but the decision of Mr Justice Peter Smith (Chancery Division, England and Wales) in the latest episode of JW Spear & Sons Ltd & Another v Zynga, Inc [2013] EWHC 3348 (Ch) (on which see earlier Katposts here and here) is well worth a read. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 2:53 pm
Court of International Trade in Danze, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 7:37 am
In Ablett v. [read post]
29 May 2016, 8:46 am
It is not due to greater comfort, for if anything, it is more comfortable to travel on the Broadway because it is not crowded. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm
Most judges were clearly much more comfortable with proxies of validity, such as qualification, publication, peer review, and general acceptance. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 5:04 pm
In Catherine Way v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 4:30 am
See Abelow v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 1:00 am
"The Attorney General explained that "... courts have held that a public employee threatened with dismissal is entitled to due process protections if he has acquired a liberty or property interest in his employment; that is, a legitimate entitlement to continued employment," citing Economico v Village of Pelham, 50 NY2d 120, Elrod v Burns, 427 US 347, and Board of Regents v Roth, 408 US 564. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 1:00 am
"The Attorney General explained that "... courts have held that a public employee threatened with dismissal is entitled to due process protections if he has acquired a liberty or property interest in his employment; that is, a legitimate entitlement to continued employment," citing Economico v Village of Pelham, 50 NY2d 120, Elrod v Burns, 427 US 347, and Board of Regents v Roth, 408 US 564. [read post]
3 May 2016, 7:38 am
The match-up was a classic one, my firm against Akin Gump: BigLaw v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 7:54 am
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and Henderson v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 10:25 am
On May 11, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court issued its per curiam opinion in Pierron v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 5:56 pm
Supreme Court's decision to dismiss certiorari in Philip Morris v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 4:11 am
Trading Technologies Int’l, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc., (N.D. [read post]
