Search for: "DIAMOND v. US "
Results 301 - 320
of 1,045
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2017, 12:22 pm
VBS Distribution, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 1:38 pm
In Diamond v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 1:38 pm
In Diamond v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 5:32 pm
In Zauderer v. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
See Winters v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 6:29 am
“[T}rivial copying does not constitute actionable infringement” Newton v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 8:13 am
Are there diamond encrusted ceilings? [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 8:00 am
” Smith v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 6:40 am
Diamond, 140 So. 3d 1090, 1096 (Fla. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 1:08 pm
Blue Diamond Growers, No. 17-55901 (9th. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 1:08 pm
Blue Diamond Growers, No. 17-55901 (9th. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 10:21 am
” Tarry presented a brief summary of the litigation context for three publications that deserve to remembered and used as exemplars of important, sound, scientific publications that helped changed the course of litigations, as well as the scientific community’s appreciation of prior misleading contentions and publications. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 10:12 am
State v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm
As many LHB readers are aware, the Law and Society Association hosts "Collaborative Research Networks" that sponsors panels for its annual meeting. [read post]
18 May 2017, 4:26 am
A 1971 decision from the Monroe County Supreme Court, Goulet v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 5:47 am
Diamond is an associate in the firm’s Family Law Practice, resident in the Morristown, NJ, office. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 2:09 am
Although the Royal Mint argued that the word sovereign had acquired distinctiveness through use, the Hearing Officer refused registration because:sovereigns are legal tender in the UK (albeit the value is nominal);the Royal Mint drew attention to the value of sovereigns in its marketing material;the Royal Mint's marketing material uses "sovereign" in an analogous way to other denominations such as the Queen's £5 coin which was issued for the… [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 9:15 am
” J.A.27 (col. 1 ll. 37–43).RecogniCorp invokes Diamond v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 12:23 pm
Although the Supreme Court in Diamond v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 4:03 am
She’s a diamond. [read post]
