Search for: "Doe 103"
Results 301 - 320
of 3,234
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2022, 7:13 am
However, the form of control which the donor retains over the trust does not make it invalid. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 5:43 am
The panel noted, “[a] generic grant of rulemaking authority to fill gaps, however, does not allow the FCC to alter the specific choices Congress made. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 8:20 am
The law in this regard was summarised by Arnold J in Jarden Consumer Solutions (Europe) Ltd v SEB SA [2014] EWHC 445 (Pat) at [103]: “[103] As Kitchin LJ and Sir Robin Jacob said in their joint judgment in Gedeon Richter plc v Bayer Pharma AG[2012] EWCA Civ 235, [2013] Bus LR D17 at [61], ‘it is trite law that… the older (from the priority date of a patent under attack) a piece of prior art said to render a patent obvious, the harder it is to show… [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 11:31 am
Nor shall this order alter the scope of PPD-30, which applies to both suspected and confirmed hostage-takings in which a United States national is abducted or held outside of the United States, as well as to other hostage-takings occurring abroad in which the United States has a national interest, but does not apply if a foreign government confirms that it has detained a United States national. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:37 pm
” But that proof does not necessarily satisfy their burden under the entire fairness standard. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 6:01 am
For example, the Trump Administration invoked Section 103(a) of TPA 2015 (19 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 4:44 am
For example, the Trump Administration invoked Section 103(a) of TPA 2015 (19 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 4:44 am
For example, the Trump Administration invoked Section 103(a) of TPA 2015 (19 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 11:58 pm
No. 103-3, at 29 (1993). [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 12:14 am
It does not show any other information relevant to the case. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:55 pm
The fact that a precedent is old does not convert that precedent to a sacred text. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am
L. 103-141, 107 Stat. 1488 (codified at 42 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 7:29 am
§ 103. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
The Open Meetings Law prohibits public bodies from conducting business in executive session, outside of public view (see Public Officers Law § 103; Matter of Lancaster v Incorporated Vil. of Freeport, 22 NY3d 30, 40 [2013]). [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
The Open Meetings Law prohibits public bodies from conducting business in executive session, outside of public view (see Public Officers Law § 103; Matter of Lancaster v Incorporated Vil. of Freeport, 22 NY3d 30, 40 [2013]). [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 2:02 am
The Draft Guidance describes a scenario where the primary endpoint does not demonstrate statistical significance, but a secondary clinical endpoint of interest shows a favorable trend; in such a situation, the trial might still demonstrate “preliminary clinical evidence” to support the BTD. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 10:00 am
Levy, 641 So. 2d 103 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm
”[1] Faigman is correct that courts often have left unarticulated exactly what the methodology is, but he does not quite make sense when he writes that the method of differential etiology is “entirely logical,” but has no “scientific methods or principles underlying it. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 3:44 am
., ,i 10; NYSCEF Doc No. 40 at 103, 107, 112 and 135). [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:49 am
No. 103-238, 108 Stat. 532 (the “1994 Amendments”). [read post]
