Search for: "Dow v. Jones"
Results 301 - 320
of 343
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm
Molk and Robertson explained that these passive funds—which follow the investments of market indexes, like the Dow Jones Industrial Average—are expected to follow these indexes. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 1:34 pm
Meeting for the first time in thirteen months, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and President Barack Obama sought to put aside their differences of the specifics of the Iran nuclear deal, choosing instead “to highlight their shared goals of confronting Iranian misbehavior, countering terrorism, bolstering Israel’s security and strategizing over the crisis in Syria. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 1:37 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993). [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:06 am
Cyber Booth, AIR 2000 Bombay 27 and the High Court of Australia in Dow Jones & Co. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 12:49 pm
Regulators and courts will have to carefully assess whether public companies manipulated the valuation process to deceive investors or whether stock declines reflect the bursting of a bubble.[2] The equity market selloff in 2022, which contributed to the worst year since 2008 for the Dow Jones, S&P 500 and the NASDAQ, has exposed U.S. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 5:50 pm
The High Court of Australia also rejected arguments in favour of a “single publication” rule in the case of Dow Jones v Gutnick ([2002] HCA 56), holding that: “Harm to reputation is done when a defamatory publication is comprehended by the reader, the listener, or the observer. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 8:35 am
For example, the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped over 5.3% that day. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:50 am
Tenet, who oversaw the brutal interrogations, and Michael V. [read post]
12 May 2022, 2:17 am
See generally Lili Levi, ‘The Problem of Trans-National Libel’ (2012) 60 American Journal of Comparative Law 507. [4] Dow Jones & Co Inc v Gutnick (2002) 210 CLR 575. [5] But see Michael Douglas, ‘Characterisation of Breach of Confidence as a Privacy Tort in Private International Law’ (2018) 41 UNSW Law Journal 490. [6] Art 4(1); see Andrew Dickinson, The [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:22 pm
In S.E.C. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
Supreme Court Industrial Union Dep’t v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 12:12 pm
The Trump administration released its latest escalation in the budding trade war with China on July 10: a 195-page list of $200 billion worth of Chinese goods that may soon be subject to a 10 percent tariff. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am
Perma Research & Development v. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 2:35 pm
Katz v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 9:11 am
Jones, E.C. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 10:37 pm
The phosphodiesterases 5 inhibitor medications (PDE5i) seem to arouse the litigation propensities of the lawsuit industry. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
See Nobelman v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 2:20 pm
Under the controlling reporter's privilege case, Gonzales v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:47 pm
Section 1 – Serious harm A statement is no longer defamatory unless a claimant can show that ‘…its publication has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to [his/her] reputation…’ This section builds on the jurisprudence of Jameel v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] EWCA Civ 75 and Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) and is intended to deter trivial claims. [read post]
