Search for: "Federal v. Levine"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,205
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm
Levin U.S. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm
According to the SEC: The federal securities laws require registered broker-dealers and investment advisers to adopt written policies and procedures reasonably designed to protect customer records and information. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
[Vega v Department of Correctional Services, 186 A.D.2d 340].In Wilbur v Town of Rockland, 53 F.3d 542, the Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, said an employee suing the Town for alleged violations of her freedom of association under the First Amendment pursuant to 42 USC 1983 was not required to exhaust her state administrative remedies as a prerequisite to commencing a federal action, the general rule being that federal courts may not require exhaustion… [read post]
20 May 2016, 6:45 am
McLaughlin and Yafit Cohn, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, on Friday, May 13, 2016 Tags: Acquisition agreements, Contracts, Corporate fraud, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Due diligence, Fair values,Fairness review, Liability standards, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Reliance Genuine Parts Co. v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 11:06 am
IMS Health, Inc. and Reed v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 9:38 am
Levine (prescription drugs, no Medical Device Amendments’ preemption clause) and Medtronic v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 1:40 pm
Hendricks v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 1:40 pm
Hendricks v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 1:40 pm
Hendricks v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 7:18 am
Levin, supra.The District Court Judge began his analysis of Levin’s argument by explaining thatLevin argues that the issuance of the NIT Warrant ran afoul of both Section 636(a) of the Federal Magistrates Act and Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 8:40 am
Under the governing federal case law, indigent defense is not a "state" nor a "county" responsibility but a "government responsibility," he declared.Chairman Herrero suggested that the charges brought are "state v. defendant" so it should be state who pays for indigent defense. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 9:05 pm
[Ira Stoll, more] “Returning to Common-Law Principles of Insider Trading After United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 1:41 pm
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009).So, is there a statutory sameness requirement for biosimilars that the FDA is conveniently forgetting about? [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 8:58 am
She was appointed to the federal district court in 2002. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:34 am
LEVIN, individually; CAROL LEVIN, individually; DURANT HOLDINGS, LLC; and BEDFORD INVESTMENTS, LLC, Appellants, v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:03 am
In Remijas v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 8:09 am
Tyson Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 3:00 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009) “is not to the contrary. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 8:00 am
Levine. [read post]
