Search for: "GOLDEN v. GOLDEN" Results 301 - 320 of 2,640
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2021, 1:31 am by Rose Hughes
 The Judge, citing previous Canadian case law, also dismissed the argument that the presence of an unexpected technical effect ("golden bonus" Janssen v Teva, 2015 FC 184) could rescue a claim that was obvious to try, given that "if a patentee obtains a workable formulation, the later discovery of one of its inherent characteristics does not add anything inventive to what had already been discovered" (para. [594], citing 2012 FC 410). [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 5:22 pm by Russell Knight
“C” equals the gross amount of: (i) the member’s monthly retirement benefit (Section III(A)) calculated as of the member’s effective date of retirement (check only one) including not including other permissive service, upgrades purchased, and other benefit formula enhancements; (ii) the member’s refund payable upon termination or lump sum retirement benefit that becomes payable, including any payable interest (Section V(A)) calculated as of the time said refund… [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 11:01 am by Chukwuma Okoli
However, after the UK Supreme Court’s decision in Rubin v Eurofinance SA, that golden thread seems to have lost its lustre. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 6:00 am by Jane Turner
Public service runs like a golden cord through the Westrick family tree. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 10:33 pm by Jeff Nowak
Among other things, you were rewarded with photos of Golden Retriever puppies, beautiful owls, dancing dads and a father/son light saber duel! [read post]
12 Dec 2020, 4:55 am by Sophia Tang
The Chinese villages win a lawsuit in China to repatriate a Mummified Buddha Statue hold by a Dutch Collector —What Role has Private International Law Played? [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 6:50 am by Russell Knight
Thus, non-deferred compensation plans are often referred to as “golden handcuffs. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:23 am by rainey Reitman
Third Party Doctrine Supreme Court Decision in US v Jones US v. [read post]