Search for: "Grant v. Board of Retirement"
Results 301 - 320
of 946
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2012, 4:35 am
The recent judgement against the two men in Solis v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:36 am
Health Services, [2007] SCR 391, SCC 27 and CUPE v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 8:08 pm
Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Health Care Plan of Northern California v. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 11:30 am
HOEY v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 7:15 am
The Las Vegas Sun’s Nevada Wonk blog has a post on retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s meeting with the Sun’s editorial board, in which she advocated for merit selection of state judges. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 5:41 pm
Merit Systems Protection Board. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:23 am
” With all of this in mind, we turn to Glaze v. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 5:48 am
Westmoreland County Employee Retirement System v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 6:00 am
Considering breaks in service in determining seniority for the purposes of layoff and reinstatement 2017 NY Slip Op 05657, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentAppeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court Ulster County granting petitioner's [Petitioner] application in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR Article 78 seeking to annul a determination of the Board of Education denying Petitioner's request for certain seniority rights.The Petitioner in action was elementary teacher and… [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:01 am
TIME discusses one of last week’s grants, Blueford v. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 12:23 pm
In Espinoza v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 7:51 am
Two years later, in McDonald v. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 7:17 am
Pendant la procédure de recours, l'opposante a retiré son opposition (lettre du 15 septembre 2015). [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 9:02 am
In Bittman v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 5:21 am
(citing Sheng v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 7:01 am
The injured worker in Krushauskas v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 10:27 am
Then Chief Justice Carson announced his retirement. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 11:51 am
Friedrichs v. [read post]
