Search for: "IN RE B E S" Results 301 - 320 of 7,795
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2009, 3:47 am by Russ Bensing
  If they’re manifest weight and insufficiency arguments, well, that’s a case that’s usually not getting read, primarily because (a) they’re so fact-specific that there’s no legal principles which are discernible, and (b) they’re almost invariably losers. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by beng
“Since the pandemic, there has been a significant uptick in large jury verdicts against employers in L&E litigation,” said Anthony J. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 3:58 am
Answer(s) will be found in the first comment.In re DeSean Ramsey DBA BearArms Bracelets, Serial No. 87708731 (March 18, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cindy B. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 8:21 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Piece of chalk and blackboard (Photo credit: Wikipedia) E is for Educational Assistance. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 2:13 am by FHH Law
But heads up, because that does not apply to §§1.2105(a)(2)(xii) and (c)(6); 1.2204(a), (c), (d)(3), and (d)(5); 1.2205(c) and (d); 1.2209; 2.1033(c)(19)(iii); 15.713(b)(2)(iv); 15.713(h)(10); 27.14(k) and (t)(6); 27.17(c); 27.19(b) and (c); 73.3700(b)(1)(i) through (v), (b)(2)(i) and (ii), (b)(3), (b)(4)(i) and (ii), and (b)(5); 73.3700(c); 73.3700(d); 73.3700(e)(2) through (6); 73.3700(f); 73.3700(g); 73.3700(h)(4)… [read post]
1 Sep 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Le juge de première instance a conclu que le droit québécois ne permettait pas d’établir une triple filiation à l’égard de X. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 9:02 am
(A) Buying a $6,000 shower curtain (B) Throwing your (much younger) wife a $2 million birthday party in Sardinia (C) Having your company buy you an $18 million Fifth Avenue apartment (D) Earning as much as $170 million in a single year (E) None of the above If you answered (E), you’re correct. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 2:30 am
These IP dignitaries aren't afraid to let you know that they're worth it with their thick and flowing fur.So, in light of today's Winter Solstice, please enjoy an IPKat Exclusive IP Who's Hair is it Anyway? [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 9:22 pm by justia.admin
(B) DIGITAL CONTENT The Final Report also analyses licensing agreements between rights holders and digital content providers. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 10:14 am by William Hamilton
This rule is analogous to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(5)(B)'s "claw-back" provision, but broader and more comprehensive. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 2:32 am by John L. Welch
A new application, or a civil action for review of this decision under Section 1071(b), would provide the opportunity for submission of additional evidence.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 3:00 am by John L. Welch
In re Nielsen Business Media, Inc., 93 USPQ2d 1545 (TTAB 2010) [precedential].In response to a Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusal of its intent-to-use application, Applicant claimed that the mark THE BOLLYWOOD REPORTER had acquired distinctiveness and was therefore registrable under Section 2(f). [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 7:33 am by admin
Comme le visa B-1, un visa B-2 peut être accordé pour une période limitée de un mois à plusieurs années, et la période maximale de séjour qui peut être initialement accordée à un individu ne peut pas être plus qu’un an. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 10:28 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
From the decision In re ReinesOn June 5, 2014, we ordered that respondent showcause as to why his actions associated with the email didnot warrant discipline by this court, inter alia, becausethey violated Rule 8.4(e) of the American Bar Association’sModel Rules of Professional Conduct. [read post]