Search for: "In re Adoption of Harris" Results 301 - 320 of 736
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
As a starting point, consider the following plainspoken language from the California Supreme Court in In re: Kay: [The government] retains a legitimate concern in ensuring that some individuals’ unruly assertion of their rights of free expression does not imperil other citizens’ rights of free association and discussion. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 6:34 am
Young, Ropes & Gray LLP, on Friday, September 22, 2017 Tags: Appraisal rights, Business judgment rule, Contracts, Controlling shareholders, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Fairness review, Fiduciary duties, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Minority shareholders, Misconduct, Shareholder suits Activism: The State of Play Posted by Martin Lipton, Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz, on Saturday, September 23,… [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 12:34 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
These perceptions are important, because fear of re-offense can greatly hinder the ability of returning prisoners to reintegrate successfully into free society. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 12:34 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
These perceptions are important, because fear of re-offense can greatly hinder the ability of returning prisoners to reintegrate successfully into free society. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 2:50 pm by Chris Castle
Former Google design ethicist Tristan Harris calls this “brain hacking. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am by Wolfgang Demino
See image of Trustee's Deed recorded in the Harris County Clerk's Office below: FIRST THE DUNNING, THEN THE DEED Section 1692e(5) prohibits threatening to take any action that cannot legally be taken, while  Section 1692e(2) prohibits falsely representing . . . the character, amount, or legal status of any debt. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
To be sure, the government can and does engage in speech of its own (think of military ads, or public service ad campaigns against smoking or other unhealthful practices), and when the government itself speaks, of course it has to adopt a particular viewpoint, essentially discriminating against all others. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am by John Elwood
We’re not quite back in every-term-a-blockbuster mode, but October Term 2017 is looking not too shabby. [read post]
10 Jun 2017, 9:32 am by Schachtman
See, e.g., In re Zoloft (Sertraline Hydrochloride) Products Liability Litigation, U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 7:59 am by Doorey
Anyways, I raise this 2012 paper now because it seems to me that Bill 148 adopts the spirit of my proposal if not the content. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:36 am by John Elwood
If you like voting cases (if, say, your name is Rick), well, you’re in luck. [read post]
1 May 2017, 5:00 am by Mike Madison
That may be due to the fact that you’ve already re-considered your entire approach to teaching, or it may be due to the fact that you see no need to change it. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
There are many factors that have contributed to increased expectations for corporations to adopt CSR programs as governments have changed the scope and thrust of their regulatory and ownership roles, and as regulatory governance principles that favor of market-based approaches have become more compelling for many states. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 6:00 am
Michael Sirkin and Nick Mozal, Ross Aronstam & Moritz LLP, on Wednesday, April 5, 2017 Tags: Corporate fraud, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Disclosure, Duty of loyalty, Financial reporting, In re Revlon, Information asymmetries, Management, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Restatements, SEC, SEC enforcement, Securities damages, Securities regulation, Settlements, Shareholder suits, Shareholder voting Poisoned Chalice? [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 2:15 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
[The one thing these senators can agree on: They’re about to do something very bad] Implicit in my discussion is that I don’t believe a 60-vote rule really gives us “moderate” nominees. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 11:00 am by Robert Chesney
Section 702 is coming up for renewal later this year, and it is clear we'll be hearing a lot in that context about the impact of SIGINT collection activities on US person communications. [read post]