Search for: "In re State Bar of Tex. "
Results 301 - 320
of 524
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2014, 3:35 pm
“Recognizing that special interests are engaged in a campaign to extend Daubert’s reach to those states that have not embraced prescriptive definitions of scientific reliability. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
But, more than two decades ago a federal court in Pennsylvania, applying Delaware law,[6] and a California appellate court[7] stated the BJR is not applicable to officers. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
But, more than two decades ago a federal court in Pennsylvania, applying Delaware law,[6] and a California appellate court[7] stated the BJR is not applicable to officers. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:48 am
In In Re: Biomet M2A Magnum Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2391 (N.D. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 11:00 am
If the stated basis is dubious, the defendant's counsel may wish to oppose it. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am
Then, state and federal courts were reluctant to apply tort law even where automobile-accident victims claimed their injuries resulted from the failure of manufacturers to exercise reasonable care in the design of their motor vehicles. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 7:56 am
Oral arguments are webcasted live on the internet through the State Bar’s CLE website. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 1:03 pm
” Tex. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 9:46 pm
In re Wessels, 311 B.R. 851, 855 (Bankr. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Nev. 2011) (FDA compliance “relevant and admissible” but not “a bar to recovery”); Bartlett v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:06 am
Calvert, 519 S.W.2d 106 (Tex. 1975). [read post]
23 May 2013, 1:44 pm
AbortionAbortion in the United States : a compilation of federal and state laws / edited by Tobe Liebert .Buffalo, NY : William S. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 6:07 am
Big Tex: mascot of Texas State Fair, burned down after being photographed. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:30 am
Frank’s Casing Crew & Rental Tools, 246 S.W.3d 42 (Tex. 2008). [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 6:51 am
McNeil Consumer & Specialty Pharmaceuticals, 672 F.3d 372 (5th Cir. 2012), holding that preemption barred the fraud on the FDA exception to the Texas statute (Tex. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm
There’s also a “best evidence rule” argument, but we’re not quarrelling with that. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 7:22 am
Tex. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 7:37 pm
Crow Iron Works, 582 S.W.2d 768, 771 (Tex.1979) (stating res judicata requires cause "finally determined, without appeal"). [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 6:58 pm
Sykes, 136 S.W.3d 635, 640 (Tex. 2004) (stating that "a dismissal constitutes a final determination on the merits of the matter actually decided"); Ritchey v. [read post]
