Search for: "In the Matter of Faith A. F." Results 301 - 320 of 2,399
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2008, 8:03 am
The Dec. 8decision of the CAFC pertained to the exceptional case/attorneys fees matter. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Lynn Fitzgerald, addressing the issue of bargaining in good faith, opined that the charges alleged by the parties stem “at least in part, from both parties’ frustration over [their] inability to reach a mutually acceptable agreement over an 11 year period. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:02 am by Larry
Santos, 36 CIT ___, ___, 883 F. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 3:56 am
" Bertine, 479 U.S. at 374 (emphasis added); see also Banks, 482 F.3d at 739 ("[s]tandardized search procedures must be 'administered in good faith' for their attendant searches to satisfy the Fourth Amendment") (quoting Bertine, 479 U.S. at 376). [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm by Brian Shiffrin
The “good faith” of a prosecutor is not a valid excuse for nondisclosure ( Giglio v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Thereafter, the Taylor Law was enacted in 1967 to enshrine 'the "strong and sweeping" public policy in favor of collective bargaining in this state' and require good faith bargaining between recognized employee organizations and public employers over the terms and conditions of employment (See Matter of City of Long Beach v New York State Pub. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Thereafter, the Taylor Law was enacted in 1967 to enshrine 'the "strong and sweeping" public policy in favor of collective bargaining in this state' and require good faith bargaining between recognized employee organizations and public employers over the terms and conditions of employment (See Matter of City of Long Beach v New York State Pub. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
Lenz subsequently sought counsel, and the video was reinstated some time after a second counter-notification was sent, and she pursued further action in the matter, asserting a misrepresentation claim under section 512(f).The heart of the case lies in section 512, and more specifically, the obligations in places on both the notified and the notified party. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 8:08 am by Andre Hanson (US)
It does not follow, however, that even a misinterpretation of UL 1995 is a falsity – or, a “deceptive act” within the meaning of the Lanham Act – rather than a matter of opinion, provided it was made in good faith and in accordance with OSHA’s criteria for independence, procedural regularity, etc. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 8:08 am by Andre Hanson (US)
It does not follow, however, that even a misinterpretation of UL 1995 is a falsity – or, a “deceptive act” within the meaning of the Lanham Act – rather than a matter of opinion, provided it was made in good faith and in accordance with OSHA’s criteria for independence, procedural regularity, etc. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 12:26 am
Cir. 1995), the Court was divested of subject matter jurisdiction and could no longer hear Huddleston's counterclaims. [read post]