Search for: "J.A. v. State" Results 301 - 320 of 662
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 12:15 pm by emagraken
Fowler, 2007 BCSC 1678, Madam Justice Holmes stated: [34]      In Tucker (Public Trustee of) v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 7:52 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Caddey, [28] Morden J.A. describes the costs sanction as a “remedial penalty”. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 10:17 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
J.A. 55. (...)The principal issue this court mustaddress is whether jurisdiction in the district court wasproper in light of the Supreme Court’s recent pronouncementin Gunn v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 6:10 am by John O'Sullivan
With specific reference to the billable hour Pepall J.A. wrote for the court at para 36: “A person requiring legal advice does not set out to buy time. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Justices Cromwell and Karakatsanis, dissenting, would have allowed the appeal for the reasons of Pepall J.A. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 4:20 am by Chantelle LaFitte
As Brenda Crossman wrote earlier this week in the Globe and Mail, the Supreme Court of Canada in R v J.A, clarified the law of consent by declaring consensual sexual activity to be an on-going process from which consent can be withdrawn at any time. [read post]