Search for: "Jane Doe v. Jane Doe I" Results 301 - 320 of 729
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2025, 5:21 am by Eugene Volokh
, see this article; when I was writing it, I wasn't thinking about the litigant's initials vs. organizational name problem, but here's a related problem from a 1996 Ninth Circuit case: The plaintiffs in this case previously were denominated "James Rowe, Jane Rowe and John Doe. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 9:10 pm
Jane Doe, a/k/a Diane Nomad, 968 F.2d 86 (D.C. [read post]
25 May 2008, 8:18 pm
Supreme court case was JOHN DOE I, JANE DOE, and JOHN DOE II v OTTE and BOTELHOIssue: Ex Post Facto Clause:Stogner v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 7:47 am by Eric Goldman
The Court will not dismiss the claims of Plaintiffs John Doe #8, Jane Does #9-10, John Doe #11, and David Ellis under Section 230 of the CDA. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 10:46 am by Susan Brenner
It’s a matter of common sense and fairness.If hearsay weren’t excluded, John Doe could take the stand and say Jane Doe told him the defendant – Richard Roe – who’s on trial for murder confessed to the whole thing. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:29 am by familoo
The Inner London FPC at Wells Street does not hold many fond memories for me – it was where I first found my feet (or lost them) as a baby-junior care practitioner and my abiding memory is of the dark waiting area on the ground floor. [read post]
21 May 2014, 6:54 am
In this edition, I think the most interesting case (of a number of interesting cases) is United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 2:51 pm by Jane S. Schacter
Jane Schacter is the William Nelson Cromwell professor of law at Stanford Law School. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:55 am by Kiran Bhat
In the Palm Beach Post, Jane Musgrave reports on efforts by two juveniles convicted of rape to have their sentences vacated in light of the Court’s decision last Term in Graham v. [read post]