Search for: "Jones v State of New York" Results 301 - 320 of 1,346
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2017, 4:01 am by The Public Employment Law Press
"The Jones decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2017/2017_07084.htmFlaherty v Milliken is posted on the Internet at:https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/3626014/matter-of-flaherty-v-milliken/ [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 5:12 am
Those in control of the workplace should not be allowed to operate "on the cheap" in the state of New York. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:38 pm
City of New York, 40 N.Y.2d 30, 35 [1976]; People v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:52 am by Matt Sundquist
Humanitarian Law Project and United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 10:28 pm
I've been interviewed by, and quoted in, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal and countless regional papers. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 8:15 am by Meir Feder
Royal Dutch Petroleum comes from Meir Feder, a partner at Jones Day, where he heads the Issues and Appeals Practice in the firm’s New York office. [read post]
30 May 2018, 1:34 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
New York's CBS Channel 2 posted a story titled Manhattan Doctor Sues Patient For $1 Million For Posting Negative Reviews Online about a woman, Michelle Levine , being sued by a doctor for posting negative reviews of the doctor on Yelp, Zocdoc, and Healthgrades.Within the CBS2 post were some suggestions for posting:Truth is an absolute defense,” attorney Steve Hyman said. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 1:14 pm by Mike Scarcella
Steiman, a medical resident in New York City, wants to contribute to Sen. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 1:38 pm
"Supreme Court Debates Violent Video Game Ban": Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this news update. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
NYPPL has received a number of requests concerning a 2008 New York State Supreme Court decision that addressed the unilateral diminishing of retiree health insurance benefits by the retiree's former public employer. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
NYPPL has received a number of requests concerning a 2008 New York State Supreme Court decision that addressed the unilateral diminishing of retiree health insurance benefits by the retiree's former public employer. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
NYPPL has received a number of requests concerning a 2008 New York State Supreme Court decision that addressed the unilateral diminishing of retiree health insurance benefits by the retiree's former public employer. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
NYPPL has received a number of requests concerning a 2008 New York State Supreme Court decision that addressed the unilateral diminishing of retiree health insurance benefits by the retiree's former public employer. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:59 am
Yesterday, the Court heard arguments in United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:17 am by Brian Shiffrin
Ferguson, 67 N.Y.2d 383, 390, 494 N.E.2d 77, 81 (1986)    The United States Supreme Court explained division of authority in New York v Hill, 528 U.S. 110 (2000):What suffices for waiver depends on the nature of the right at issue. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 8:09 am by Jay Stanley
Although the Supreme Court addressed this subject in its landmark decision in United States v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 12:37 pm
The first, and the real driving force behind the enactments, is personal jurisdiction.The New York law is a fairly direct response to Ehrenfeld v. [read post]
26 Nov 2016, 4:40 pm by Jeremy Saland
As the court sees no way to distinguish the relative strength of these inferences, the court finds that they are of equal and opposite strength (see, e.g., People v Dudley, 53 Misc 3d 679 [Crim Ct, New York County 2016]; People v Spry, 50 Misc 3d 1208 [A] [Crim Ct, New York County 2016]); but see, People v Monroe-Francis, 51 Misc 3d 1202 [A] [Crim Ct, New York County 2016]; People v Jones, 50 Misc 3d… [read post]
26 Nov 2016, 4:40 pm by Jeremy Saland
As the court sees no way to distinguish the relative strength of these inferences, the court finds that they are of equal and opposite strength (see, e.g., People v Dudley, 53 Misc 3d 679 [Crim Ct, New York County 2016]; People v Spry, 50 Misc 3d 1208 [A] [Crim Ct, New York County 2016]); but see, People v Monroe-Francis, 51 Misc 3d 1202 [A] [Crim Ct, New York County 2016]; People v Jones, 50 Misc 3d… [read post]