Search for: "Matter of State of New York v John T."
Results 301 - 320
of 1,332
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2020, 9:03 pm
New York. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
The Supreme Court stated that for a Court to assess the bona fides of a validity challenge to the arbitration agreement that only a Court can resolve requires: (a) First, the court must determine whether, assuming the facts pleaded to be true, there is a genuine challenge to arbitral jurisdiction. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 5:04 pm
Appearances matter. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 10:25 am
"[T]o be considered documentary,' evidence must be unambiguous and of undisputed authenticity" (Fontanetta v John Doe 1, 73 AD3d 78, 86; see Cives Corp. v George A. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:02 pm
Brian Schatz (D-HI) and John Thune (R-SD), is a huge step forward. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 1:53 pm
United States and Trumbo v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
There is both good and bad news in the pair of cases, Chiafalo v. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 1:30 pm
New York tried to do the same (the acronym for the law was the TRUMP Act), but it failed to pass. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm
(The court also ruled in a related but distinct case concerning Trump’s efforts to block subpoenas for his financial records from New York state law enforcement; a summary of that decision, Trump v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 9:18 am
” President Trump didn’t heed the New York court’s warning. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 4:08 pm
The simpler of the two cases decided today was the New York grand jury case, Trump v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 10:28 am
Vance, stems from a dispute over a subpoena issued to Mazars by Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance as part of an investigation by a state grand jury into criminal violations of New York law. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 11:17 pm
In 1944, New York’s highest court, the Court of Appeals, held, in a silicosis personal injury case, that: “[i]t is a matter of common knowledge that it is injurious to the lungs and dangerous to health to work in silica dust, a fact which defendant was bound to know. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 7:42 am
Perhaps it is none-of-the-above, as I explain in this New York Times op-ed. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Seila Law v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 2:28 pm
See Fox v. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 6:57 am
[UPDATE 6-20-20 4:15 PM EDT: Several readers have called my attention to the 10th Circuit case of US v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse examines “the sharply contrasting vantage points from which the majority and [Justice Samuel Alito’s] dissent … viewed the issue, whether from the past, present or future. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am
John’s Episcopal Church holding a bible above his head. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 4:23 am
In addition, he points out that many states, including New York, also have laws prohibiting such discrimination. [read post]
