Search for: "Merck and Co," Results 301 - 320 of 1,277
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2014, 9:00 am by Dan Ernst
  This summer, Duke History doctoral student Ashton Merck is taking on the task of bringing the site up to date.If you are responsible for (or even just know about) sites/webpages that require updates or that you think merit inclusion on “Legal History on the Web,” please send along the relevant information to: Ashton Merck at ashton.merck@duke.edu. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 3:11 pm by Schachtman
Merck & Co. 924 F.Supp. 2d 477, 497 (S.D.N.Y. 2013); Pritchett v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 3:44 am by Broc Romanek
In this 2-minute video, I run down 23 great ways that Merck enhances the usability of its 2014 proxy statement: Corp Fin Revises WKSI Waiver Policy Statement Again Last week, Corp Fin revised its policy statement concerning when it will grant a waiver of ineligible issuer status for WSKIs for the 2nd time over the past few months. [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 6:39 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See In re Merck & Co., 800F.2d 1091, 1099 (Fed. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 2:11 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Despite the concerns about cost, twelve Senators have signed on as co-sponsors. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co., 973 P.2d 527, 542 (Cal. 1999)), which don’t follow anybody else’s pattern. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:46 pm
American Honda Motor Co., 529 U.S. 861 (2000), which PLAC not only briefed, but helped organize (defense counsel was simultaneously on PLAC’s case selection committee). [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 8:52 am by Drew Falkenstein
Murphy, M.D., former co-chief of the NIAID Laboratory of Infectious Diseases. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 2:49 pm
  As a consequence, there are still two Merck companies in the world and the co-existence of their Merck trade marks is certainly the subject of one or several co-existence agreements between the two companies. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 1:55 am by Jon Gelman
Today's post was shared by FairWarning and comes from www.reuters.com Merck & Co said on Friday it will pay $100 million to resolve all U.S. product liability lawsuits alleging it downplayed serious health risks involving its NuvaRing intrauterine contraceptive device.The product, which contains the hormones estrogen and progestin commonly found in birth control bills, is associated with an increased risk of developing blood clots that can cause heart attacks, strokes or sudden… [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:44 pm by Pete Strom
Merck Agrees to Settle NuvaRing Consolidated Personal Injury Cases for $100 Million Merck & Co, the second-largest pharmaceutical company in the US, has agreed to settle several thousand consolidated lawsuits against the company’s hormonal birth control device,NuvaRing, for $100 million. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 6:07 pm by Dr. Shezad Malik
According to confidential sources, Merck & Co. has agreed to pay $100 million to settle more than 1,700 lawsuits. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 9:21 am
., a company which was subsequently acquired by Merck & Co., and was approved by the U.S. [read post]