Search for: "Office of People's Counsel v. PUBLIC SERV." Results 301 - 320 of 1,320
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2021, 12:35 pm by Vercammen Law
The Court agrees with the Appellate Division that when “counsel for an alleged mentally incapacitated person makes a motion to appoint a [guardian ad litem],” the motion must be served on that person. [read post]
22 May 2021, 2:46 pm
 They have brazenly desecrated and defiled the national flag and emblem, incited Hong Kong people to oppose China and the Communist Party of China (‘CPC’), besiege Central People's Government (‘CPG’) offices in Hong Kong, and discriminate and ostracize Mainland personnel in Hong Kong. [read post]
19 May 2021, 8:47 am by Jonathan Shaub
(Take, as an example, the OLC Reporting Act of 2008, which the Office of Legal Counsel recommended the president veto as unconstitutional.) [read post]
4 Apr 2021, 10:49 am by Eugene Volokh
"Worked alongside them" doesn't, I think, mean constant close physical proximity (especially when you're talking about an organization's president, who most people would assume has his own office). [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am by William Ford, Victoria Gallegos
The committee will hear testimony from Oona Hathaway, former special counsel to the Defense Department; Bob Bauer, former White House counsel; and Jack Goldsmith, former assistant attorney general for the Office of Legal Counsel. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 8:39 am by Mark Ashton
 Acknowledging the strict scrutiny standard, the Court opined that the gag order contained “restrictions …narrowly tailored to serve a compelling state interest” consistent with Republican Party of Minn. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 8:39 am by Mark Ashton
 Acknowledging the strict scrutiny standard, the Court opined that the gag order contained “restrictions …narrowly tailored to serve a compelling state interest” consistent with Republican Party of Minn. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 12:44 pm by Ellis Cose
NAACP executive secretary Walter White called the publication “excellent publicity” for the NAACP’s work. [read post]
13 Mar 2021, 12:41 pm by Eugene Volokh
Even if there is a compelling governmental interest in protecting people from abuse, harassment, and mental distress, barring a broad range of public criticism cannot be narrowly tailored to serve that interest. [read post]