Search for: "People v. Levell (1988)"
Results 301 - 320
of 461
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
The results of the study indicate that the ideas and language of many of the major philosophers appear in caselaw at every level in the Canadian courts. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Davis v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Davis v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:00 am
” Wrighten v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 12:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
So too, in Flowers v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 7:20 am
While the case related to whether Murphy had been lawfully prosecuted under section 297(1) of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (CDPA) for intending to avoid programme reception charges (which the CJEU and then High Court confirmed she had not, as she had not intended to avoid but merely to pay less via use of a foreign decoder), it opened up the wider issue of retransmission rights. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 5:04 am
See, e.g., People ex rel. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:54 am
Supreme Court stripped tribal governments of their criminal authority over non-Indians in Oliphant v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March 2017) [36]… [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 8:00 am
If most of the people I write about are extremists, then postwar movement conservatism -- and perhaps conservatism per se -- are extremist. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
Many commentators, including members of Congress and presidents, criticize judicial rulings as being influenced by improper philosophies or even by improper desires to protect partisan interests—think, for example, about the criticism of the conservative majorities in Bush v. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 10:56 am
Ohio 2006) (reducing all studies to one level, and treating all criticisms as though they rendered all studies invalid). 6 Id. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
Indeed, in Gratz v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 6:44 am
Div. 1988) (citations omitted). [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
In Wallace v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 6:47 am
It is as if the songwriters do not exist and the only people who matter are the recording artists. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 5:26 am
Fiore v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 3:10 pm
Again, one need not accept such claims: The evidence linking Serrano v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:30 pm
Olson(1988)). [read post]
