Search for: "Peters v. The State of Texas"
Results 301 - 320
of 629
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2014, 4:36 am
Gottfrid is only allowed to receive letters while Peter gladly receives books, letters and vegan candy. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 9:08 pm
It runs through the nineteenth century, where a number of states (including Tennessee and Texas, at page 20) seem to have copied North Carolina's language and prohibited monopolies and perpetuties. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 1:33 pm
Both the arresting officer and attorney stated that they were unaware of the Supreme Court’s decisions in Texas v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:41 pm
” Peter W. [read post]
31 May 2014, 5:22 am
After all, it’s only been the law since 1989, when the Supremes decided Texas v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 11:38 am
Johnson (1989) and United States v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 12:44 pm
Christopher Capital Management Group, LLC; and The Solomon Fund, LPCase number: 13-cv-00739 (United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas)Case filed: February 15, 2013Qualifying judgment/order: March 4, 2014 3/24/2014 6/23/2014 2014-26 SEC v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 6:51 pm
Peters, 450 Fed.Appx. 470, 478-79 (6th Cir. 2011) (affirming summary judgment for defendants when plaintiffs expert witnesses failed to provide clear testimony that plaintiff specific condition would have been improved by timely administration of therapy); Bonesmo v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
See United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 7:03 am
– Fisher v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 7:42 am
(See also this article by Preston Green and Peter Moran on state constitutional provisions that may bar vouchers.) [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 4:03 am
State, 357 S.W.3d 66 (Texas Court of Appeals 2011) (quoting Peter T. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 10:33 am
Kagan also was a nemesis for the lawyer for the protesting states, Texas Solicitor General Jonathan F. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 10:48 am
Wexler The EEOC has come under fire from Courts, State Attorney Generals, and even the entire State of Texas because of its guidance document regarding use of criminal background checks as hiring screens. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
Mandel: Plenary Power v. the Professor, by Peter H. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 9:03 pm
Next, representing state governments, will be the solicitor general of Texas, Jonathan F. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 11:55 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am
District Court for the Northern District of Texas on September 12, 2012. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am
District Court for the Northern District of Texas on September 12, 2012. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am
Attorney)Source of Law: United StatesVerdict or Settlement Amount: N/ALegal Claims: Computer Fraud and Abuse ActFraudTheftOtherCourt Name: United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas: Dallas DivisionLegal Counsel: Douglas A Morris (Federal Public Defender - Dallas); Ahmed Ghappour (University of Texas Law School), Charles D. [read post]
