Search for: "Powers v. Steele" Results 301 - 320 of 898
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2022, 8:01 am by Dan Bressler
“Canada: Lawyer Who Was Consulted By Another Lawyer Disqualified From Acting Against Other Lawyer” — “2658396 Ontario Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 10:33 am by Joost Pauwelyn
  Streamlining Tuna with Cloves, in both cases we now have:  (1) a finding of discrimination (cloves v. menthols in Cloves; stricter labeling requirements in the ETP v. outside the ETP in Tuna) and  (2) a finding that the ban on cloves / strict labeling requirements in the ETP are not more trade restrictive than necessary. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 1:24 am by Donald Dinnie
Referring to Van Reenen Steel (Pty) Ltd v Smith NO and Transnet v Rubenstein, the Labour Appeal Court held that the principle on common mistake is more correctly formulated as requiring three elements to be proven: the contract was based on a common assumption; the assumption was incorrect; and the subject matter of the assumption was vital to the transaction – in other words, had both parties been aware of the true position the transaction would not have… [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:03 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The Supreme Court explained: Recognizing that the word “jurisdiction” has been used by courts, including this Court, to convey “many, too many, meanings,” Steel Co. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 6:54 am
On 30 June 2009, three Judges of the Federal Court handed down their decision in Dura-Post (Aust) Pty Ltd v Delnorth Pty Ltd [2009] FCAFC 81. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 4:07 am by Andrew Frisch
In Gorman, the Second Circuit held that donning and doffing of protective gear-helmet, safety glasses, and steel-toed boots-was not integral and indispensable to employment at a nuclear power plant. [read post]