Search for: "Richardson v. Persons" Results 301 - 320 of 677
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2016, 2:30 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employers, insurers and other health plan sponsors or issuers (health plans), health care providers, healthcare clearinghouses (covered entities) and their business associates should reevaluate the adequacy of their practices and procedures for the protection of electronic protected health information (ePHI) on or accessible through laptops or other mobile devices in light of the $2.75 million penalty and other schooling the Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights (OCR) just… [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Bailii has recently made available a judgment of 22 June 2016 in the case of Richardson v Google UK Ltd [2016] EWHC 1534 (QB)) in which Sir David Eady made an extended civil restraint order against the claimant. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 2:32 am by Douglas McGregor, Brodies LLP
There has been some discussion regarding the merits of the decision of the English Court of Appeal in the case of Richardson v Pitt-Stanley [1995] QB 123 over the last 20 years (see, for example, paragraphs 5.15 & 13.12 of Munkman on Employer’s Liability, 16th Edition). [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 9:31 am by Jo Ann Hoffman & Associates, P.A.
 No less than 18 cases were pending before the Florida Supreme Court on the same issue where attorneys were receiving hourly fees of $1.58 as in Castellanos, $19.44 per hour in Richardson v Aramark, $50.44 per hour  in Pfeffer v Labor Ready, and $13.28 per hour in Diaz v Palmetto General. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 8:31 am by Jason Rantanen
” The court, like many other courts and a number of commentators, interpreted the Federal Circuit’s 2010 decision in Richardson v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 6:16 am
Ressler, 17 N.Y.2d 174, 179 [Court of Appeals of New York 1966]; Jerome Prince, Richardson on Evidence § 5–406 [Farrell 11th ed 2008]).People v. [read post]