Search for: "Robert P. Cross" Results 301 - 320 of 572
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2011, 9:19 am by jpfaff
This post will look at Kennedy's opinion, my next one at Robert's. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 11:15 am
For publication opinions today (3): In Robert Williams v. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 12:09 pm
                   [Image: Confusion of Tongues, illustration by Gustave Dore (1832-1883)]           In a decision filed November 20, 2007, Judge Robert P. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:42 pm
The Montana Supreme Court rejected petitioners’ claim that this statute violates the First Amendment. 2011 MT 328, 363 Mont. 220, 271 P. 3d 1. [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 11:22 am by georgbrem
. ''In all the time I taught him we never had cross words,'' Rimmer said from London in a telephone interview. ''Somewhere along the line he must have met some sort of fanatics, and they must have turned his mind.'' Rimmer described the institution -- an elite college preparatory school in the West African country, attended by children of diplomats and wealthy Africans -- as ''lovely, lovely environment'' where Christians often… [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization symposium on Daniel Carpenter, Democracy by Petition: Popular Politics in Transformation, 1790–1870 (Harvard University Press, 2021).Daniel Carpenter[1] Is there anything like the petition of lore left in our republic? [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 4:46 pm
    Assignor estoppel got its start in late 18th-century England and crossed the Atlantic about a hundred years later. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
Never too late 32 [week ending Sunday 8 February] –- Brazilian PTO’s delays | The Research Handbook on International Intellectual Property reviewed | Laura Smith-Hewitt | IP, women and leadership: the poll responses | Decline of West’s trust in innovation | Wikipedia public domain photos |CJEU in Case C-383/12 P Environmental Manufacturing LLP v OHIM | The Nordic IP Forum | The future of EPO’s BoA | Warner-Lambert v… [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am by Schachtman
” Judge Van Graafeiland dissented, indelicately pointing out that the majority had charged the defendant with failing to show that it had been deprived of a fair opportunity to cross-examine plaintiff’s expert witnesses while depriving the defendant of access to the secret underlying evidence and materials that were needed to demonstrate what could have been done on cross-examination[3]. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 2:19 am by Seán Binder
Richard Pérez-Peña, Farnaz Fassihi, and Michael Crowley report for the New York Times. [read post]