Search for: "Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd." Results 301 - 320 of 488
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2015, 9:43 am by Dennis Crouch
Zimmer, Inc., et al., No. 14-1520 (enhanced damages) (linked to Halo) Petition for Writ of Certiorari Pending: Design Patents: Samsung Electronics Co. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 4:17 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  Lastly, the complaint states that Renesas once asserted a patent related to the ‘432 patent against Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. in the U.S. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 8:23 am by Eric Schweibenz
  In support of its motion, SEA argued that ITRI improperly seeks documents that are not in SEA’s possession, custody, or control, but that are in the sole possession, custody, or control of SEA’s South Korean parent company, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. [read post]
30 May 2012, 7:15 am by aschwartz
The court based its decision largely on the decision in Samsung Electronics Co, LTD v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:22 am by Dennis Crouch
Lee, No. 15-446 (BRI construction in IPRs; institution decisions unreviewable) Samsung Electronics Co. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 6:47 am
 What happens if an unconditional limitation application is now made before the appeal is over is not clear to this Kat - something similar happened in Samsung Electronics Co LTD v Apple Retail UK LTD & Anor [2014] EWCA Civ 250 (reported by IPKat here), which made it clear that the central limitation route was permissible, but left it open to the Court of Appeal, once the limitation proceedings were concluded, to decide that the appeal… [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 1:59 am by Eleonora Rosati
“Severe frustration” a common problem for litigants, but not moral prejudiceWirex Ltd v Cryptocarbon Global Ltd [2022] EWHC 1161 (IPEC) (May 2022)In a short 31 paragraph IPEC judgment, HHJ Hacon assessed the Claimant’s entitlement to damages having previously found the Defendants liable for trade mark infringement. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 6:58 am
Starting from this year, once every year, the forum, through close cooperation with Shanghai Transnational Purchasing Center Co. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 4:29 pm
Jang, Fargo, ...The process for producing nano-scaled graphene plate material comprises the steps ...Polyolefin nano-compositeUS Pat. 6872791 - Filed December 22, 2001 - Samsung Atofina Co. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:36 am by Eric Schweibenz
The complaint alleges that Robert Bosch GmbH of Germany and Bosch Security Systems, Inc. of Fairpoint, New York (collectively, “Bosch”), Samsung Techwin Co., Ltd. of Korea and Samsung Opto-Electronics America Inc. d/b/a Samsung Techwin America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey (collectively, “Samsung”), and Sony Corporation of Japan and Sony Electronics, Inc. of San Diego, California (collectively,… [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 8:08 am by Shouvik Kumar Guha
Addisons Paint and Chemicals Ltd. and the IPAB order in the Payyannur Ring matter. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:15 pm by Eric Schweibenz
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following entities as the respondents in this investigation: Acer Inc. of Taiwan Brother Industries, Ltd. of Japan Canon Inc. of Japan Dane-Elec Memory of France Dell Inc. of Round Rock, Texas Falcon Northwest Computer Systems, Inc. of Medford, Oregon Fujitsu Limited of Japan Jasco Products Company of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Hewlett-Packard Company of Palo Alto, California HiTi Digital, Inc. of Taiwan Kingston Technology… [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 1:00 pm
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is Sharp Corporation (“Sharp”) and the Respondents are Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 12:58 am
The IPKat has been reading yet another monster judgment from the Patents Court, Dyson Technology Ltd v Samsung Gwangju Electronics Co Ltd [2009] EWHC 55 (Pat), which issued just a couple of days ago on 22 January. [read post]