Search for: "State v. Lilly"
Results 301 - 320
of 912
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2015, 1:52 pm
Addressing the merits of the Title VII claim, the district court determined that his claim was controlled by the Supreme Court’s decisions in Johnson v Transportation Agency, Santa Clara County, California (480 U.S. 616 (1987)), and United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC v Weber (20 EPD ¶30,026 (1979). [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 1:33 pm
See Hexum v. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 8:00 am
United States Gov't & His Religion, 2015 U.S. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 11:27 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 5:30 am
Is King v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 1:16 pm
That is precisely what happened in Fields v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 4:41 am
The case is Sugartown Worldwide LLC v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 4:22 am
Kachina Pipeline Company v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 11:10 am
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., as Subrogee of RENEE M. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 7:27 am
Summary judgment was affirmed (Davis v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 4:49 am
Eli Lilly and Co., 2015 U.S. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [week ending on Sunday 7 June] - Swiss claims | Italian-sounding trade marks for cosmetics | “IP… [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 1:55 pm
Patent No. 8,177,449• Count V for Patent Infringement: Inducement To Infringe U.S. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
” In Pason Systems Corp. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 8:59 am
In Kachina Pipeline Company, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 8:59 am
In Kachina Pipeline Company, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
… and then Darren takes the floor for a more in-depth analysis.* Canary Wharf: great place name, not much hope for a trade mark ...Jeremy writes upCanary Wharf Group Ltd v Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks [2015] EWHC 1588 (Ch), a Chancery Division, England and Wales, decision with a history, and a curious trade mark tale too.* A novel becomes a saga - Actavis v Lilly set to go on and onThe IPKat blogged last year about the… [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 5:34 am
According to this approach, Smith & Nephew’s product (which contains 0.77% binding agent) would fall within the scope of the claim.Smith & Nephew, on the other hand, argued that the limits of the claimed range were precisely as they were stated (i.e. a concentration of 0.999% would not fall within the scope of the claim). [read post]
