Search for: "Supreme Court U.S.A."
Results 301 - 320
of 662
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
In honor of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's recent grant of an appeal on the Restatement (Second)/Restatement (Third) in Tincher v. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 12:30 pm
Supreme Court's 1994 decision in Heck v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 6:17 am
” Supreme Court to Resolve Split Over Copyright Registrations — The Supreme Court picked up its first copyright case this term on the last day of the term. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 12:08 pm
Corp., Glock Inc. and Smith & Wesson Corp., could ask for a rehearing from the appellate court or petition for a transfer to the Indiana Supreme Court. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:54 pm
As I fill the backlog, we have yet another big decision from the California Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 6:02 pm
But the Supreme Court is necessarily a generalist institution. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:05 am
use to keep a close eye on the minutiae of the Supreme Court’s docket. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:31 am
So the bad news is that we observe a very standard trope from the Supreme Court. [read post]
9 May 2007, 12:55 am
In the words of the Supreme Court: "Context matters. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 8:58 am
CASES PENDING AT THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT There is 1 case pending at the California Supreme Court. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 8:53 pm
Disbarment Documents *Petition to Accept Disbarment Of Scott Rothstein; *Florida Supreme Court's High Profile Order in Rothstein Disbarment Proceeding; *Disbarment on Consent; *Florida Bar's Affidavit of Costs in Rothstein Disbarment Proceeding; and *Disbarment Order. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 12:47 am
Disposing of a preliminary Eleventh Amendment question, the Eleventh Circuit decided that we owe that EPA regulation deference under Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2024, 12:44 pm
Department of Commerce, No. 22-1219, the Supreme Court will consider whether to overrule Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 2:39 pm
§ 1.78) are applied (...)Yes, the Supreme Court Chevron case comes up:Judge Andrews' decision that HTC was correct in challenging the priority of the '105, '181, and '720 patents was based in his determination that the PTO was not entitled to deference under Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 5:23 pm
Cir.2013)) (obviousness).Because the district court’s claim constructions were based solely on theintrinsic record, the Supreme Court’s recentdecision in Teva does not require us to review the district court’sclaim construction any differently than under thede novo standard we have long applied.Fenner Invs., Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
The Ninth Circuit based its ruling on the holding of a prior California Supreme Court case, Kwikset v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 4:05 am
But federal courts review "judgments, not opinions," Chevron U.S.A. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 7:35 am
” Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:06 pm
Edwin Pawloski and U.S.A. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 4:00 pm
But, as Republicans said after the confirmation of Amy Coney Barrett as a Justice on the Supreme Court last month, elections have consequences. [read post]
