Search for: "United States v. General Electric Co." Results 301 - 320 of 520
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2009, 10:58 am
Plaintiffs claim that global warming, to which Defendants contribute as the "five largest emitters of carbon dioxide in the United States and . . . among the largest in the world," Connecticut v. [read post]
19 Nov 2024, 8:33 am by Sasha Volokh
United States, No. 23-402) didn't consider the Appointments Clause at all, so it would not be a good vehicle for a grant of certiorari. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
  By way of background, the publisher filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on December 23, 2011, against eBook publisher, Open Road Integrated Media. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 12:02 pm
Capital Terminal Co., 391 F.3d 312, 325 n.19 (1st Cir. 2004); United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 7:45 am by Schachtman
United States, 929 F.2d 1235, 1239 (8th Cir. 1991), decided before the Supreme Court decided Daubert.) [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm by John Elwood
” Twice-rescheduled Dean Foods Co. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 8:27 pm by Alex Craigie
Justice Stevens gave one illustration, in General Electric Co. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 9:05 pm
The drywalls in question were imported into the United States from China between 2001 until 2007 due to the shortage of US produced drywall. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 7:03 am
The case was General Electric v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 5:35 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Accordingly, this is not a situation, as in Parke-Davis & Co. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 4:02 pm by admin
On June 20, 2011, the high court issued an 8-0 opinion (with Justice Sonia Sotomayor recused) in the case of American Electric Power Co. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 1:47 pm
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 591 N.E.2d 222, 225-26 (N.Y. 1992); Firestone Steel Products Co. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 7:23 am by Schachtman
  The Milward decision embraced a vacuous methodology sometimes called “weight of the evidence” (WOE) or “inference to the best explanation,” which had been previously rejected by other Circuits, as well as by the United States Supreme Court, in General Electric Co. v. [read post]