Search for: "United States v. State of NY" Results 301 - 320 of 2,843
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2010, 5:20 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States, 491 F.3d 1327, 1330 (Fed. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
Tucker served as lead counsel in both Glucksberg v Washington and Quill v NY, which raised federal constitutional claims seeking to establish the right; both cases were heard by the Supreme Court of the United States in the mid-1990s. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 6:38 pm
Thus, it has been held that collecting information about the movement of a vehicle on public thoroughfares by means of an electronic device attached to a vehicle's undercarriage, which does not damage the vehicle or invade its interior, does not constitute a search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment (see United States v Knotts, 460 U.S. at 281-282; United States v McIver, 186 F3d 1119, 1126-1127 [9th Cir 1999], cert denied 528… [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 12:12 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
  SLAM's latest motion and memorandum to the Missouri federal court in the forfeiture case of United States v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Employees v Huntington, 2014 NY Slip Op 03271, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentPublic Officers Law §18*permits a political or civil subdivision of the State whose governing body has agreed by the adoption of local law, by-law, resolution, rule or regulation to “confer the benefits of the section” upon its employees, and (ii) to be held liable for the costs incurred under these provisions including the defense and indemnification its officers and… [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 3:07 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
Gordon to as much incarceration as defendants in other ivory smuggling cases, including relatedcases.AUSA LaVerne disagreed with these arguments, expressing in the prosecution's memorandum,An appropriate sentence must reflect, in particular, (i) the seriousness of this offense, which is increasingly the focus of national and global law enforcement and policy efforts; (ii) the importance of general deterrence, which courts have recognized has special relevance in this context; (iii) the… [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 7:13 am by Joel R. Brandes
The mother removed the child to the United States twice, and twice was ordered by the district court to return the child to Turkey.( Pliego v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Amendment to Civil Service Law §167(8) does not violate the compensation clause for certain judges set out in Article VI, §25[a] of the State Constitution Bransten v State of New York, 2017 NY Slip Op 08168, Court of AppealsIn 2011 the State-employee unions, in the course of collective bargaining, agreed to a percentage reduction to the State's employer contributions for health insurance to avoid layoff, salary freezes and unpaid… [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 5:28 am
Last week, in Matter of Cale v Commissioner of Labor, 2007 NY Slip Op 09850, the Third Department held that if the professional position is eliminated by the employer the TN visa holder may not receive New York State unemployment insurance benefits. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 2:31 pm by Jon Sands
The plea agreement stated that the defendant agreed to waive "[a]ny right conferred by Title 18, United States Code, Section 3742 to appeal the sentence. [read post]