Search for: "WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS COMPANY" Results 301 - 320 of 547
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2007, 9:50 am
[PDF] BIOCOM [PDF] Ceres [PDF] Eastman Kodak Company [PDF] Eli Lilly and Company [PDF] IBM Corporation [DOC] Microsoft Corporation [DOC] Wyeth [DOC] See all the comments here. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 7:50 pm
Rost wrote: "Drug companies are their own worst enemies. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 8:34 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
They claim that the pharmaceutical company could have marketed a vaccine that was safer and included better warnings about its possible risks. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 10:09 pm by FDABlog HPM
District Court for the District of New Jersey concerning Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 8:01 am
Supreme Court's decision in Wyeth v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 7:39 pm
The New England Journal of Medicine has filed a friend of the court brief to the United States Supreme Court in the case of Wyeth v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 8:32 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
Hebron, a Brazilian pharmaceutical company, filed a lawsuit challenging the denial of a patent application by the patent office. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 6:23 pm by Carey, Danis & Lowe
Kendall, 66, sued pharmaceutical company Pfizer after spending 11 years taking the hormone replacement drugs Prempro and Provera, products of Pfizer corporate units. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 2008 WL 7136137 (Ala. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 6:20 am
(noting that "Switzerland's Serono and Germany's Schering, Altana and Schwarz were all sold in 2006" and that "Britain's Astra Zeneca and America's Wyeth and Bristol-Myers Squibb" may be the next targets for larger, acquiring firms) [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 4:42 am by Sean Wajert
Super. 2003). , in which a New Jersey appeals court emphasized the difference between the pharmaceutical industry and other companies. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:06 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”  But, though some federal courts interpreting Pennsylvania law have reasoned that justifiable reliance/causation can’t be present when the pharmaceutical company didn’t sell directly to the patient, this “threatens to swallow up any cause of action brought against a drug manufacturer for failure to warn, as every claim—whether derived from statute or common-law tort—includes an element of causation or justified reliance. [read post]
7 May 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Two, since both Mensing and Wyeth v. [read post]