Search for: "DANIELS v. STATE" Results 3181 - 3200 of 5,116
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2010, 8:31 pm by Jeff Gamso
It was my plan to write about Billy Wayne Coble, more precisely, to write about the opinion in Billy Wayne Coble v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 5:14 pm by Christa Culver
Wolfish (1979), which focuses on whether a “condition of confinement” constitutes punishment, can be reconciled with Daniels v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 9:30 pm by Alana Bevan
Department of State and the U.S. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 7:26 am by Söğüt Atilla
The Retromark update also listed the infamous Lidl v Tesco case, in which the Court of Appeal (England and Wales) reversed the copyright infringement finding but reluctantly upheld the trade mark infringement ruling; the Lifestyle Equities v Amazon case, where the UK Supreme Court confirmed that Amazon US was targeting UK consumers; and the commonly misunderstood Supermacs v EUIPO case where, the General Court of the EU merely stated that McDonalds’ use of… [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am by Joel R. Brandes
Bank National Association v Langner, 168 AD3d 1021 [2d Dept 2019])” The Court observed that CPLR § 2309 sets forth the way oaths and affirmations are to be administered and notes in section (c) regarding oaths and affirmations taken without the state: An oath or affirmation taken without the state shall be treated as if taken within the state if it is accompanied by such certificate or certificates as would be required to entitle a deed acknowledged… [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 11:36 am by Katherine Pompilio
Kurup posted the unanimous court decision in FBI v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:30 am by Ben
Judge Daniels held:  “The relevant legal question is not the extent to which Bernstein contributed to or financed the 1965 concert .... [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am by Schachtman
Furthermore, Justice Blackmun’s observation about traditional means was looking back at an era when in most state and federal court, a person found to be minimally qualified, could pretty much say anything regardless of scientific validity. [read post]