Search for: "Ex Parte United States"
Results 3201 - 3220
of 5,111
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2012, 2:36 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has already issued first Office actions concerning three Apple patents that are being asserted against Samsung in district court and at the ITC (in chronological order, the rubber-banding '381 patent, the "Steve Jobs" '949 touchscreen heuristics patent, and the pinch-to-zoom API patent). [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 6:33 am
Since and because of Quirin, it has become accepted that literally any individual present in the United States has a constitutional right to habeas corpus. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 4:08 pm
A couple of hours ago Samsung proudly informed Judge Koh of the fact that the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has tentatively rejected, in a first Office action dated December 29 (mailing date), all 21 claims of U.S. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 6:26 am
I wanted to take the time (despite all the Apple-Samsung action yesterday) to identify the most interesting parts of those filings. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 7:00 am
“Deus ex Machina. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 5:36 am
United States, 265 F.3d 1371, 1375 (Fed. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 5:36 am
United States, 265 F.3d 1371, 1375 (Fed. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 11:38 am
United States, 702 F.2d 1005, 1013 (Fed. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 7:59 am
Harr, a highway contractor for the United States Postal Service (USPS), came under investigation by a special task force to address a trend among contractors of failing to maintain workers' compensation coverage despite receiving funds from the USPS to purchase coverage. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 2:27 pm
Although British merchants and traders, to their great shame, played a major part in the trans-Atlantic slave trade throughout the 1600s and 1700s, Britain was then at the forefront of the abolition of the slave trade and slavery from 1807 onwards and the common law has always considered slavery to be abhorrent (as the famous case of ex parte Somersett in 1772 made clear). [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 1:43 pm
In United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:00 am
“Deus ex Machina. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:38 am
” Virginia: As the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia recently made clear in JTH Tax, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 2:28 pm
Al- Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 54 - Supreme Court clarifies meaning of “guilty of acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations” for the purpose of refusing refugee status, two applicants lose appeal. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 12:38 pm
” For the most part, this willingness to tolerate all sorts of nonsense favored plaintiffs. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 8:27 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:28 am
http://bit.ly/Xp5RPv (Michael Maslanka) eDiscovery and Social Media: Recap from TLI Litigation Summit, Part II – http://bit.ly/QnpRA4 (Gina Rubel) eDiscovery: Resolving Issues Through a Collaborative Approach – http://bit.ly/XBIXES (Martin O’Hara) eLessons Learned: Interview with the Honorable Ronald J. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 9:41 am
Now is the time to think carefully about the vast law and policy implications of what it will mean when the United States is no longer at war. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 8:37 am
Details: Ex parte Ryan, Jr. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 7:44 am
In its motion, the government sought an ex parte review, even though lawyers for Kim all had security clearances and classified discovery had been ongoing for close to two years subject to a protective order. [read post]
