Search for: "Line v. Line" Results 3221 - 3240 of 45,554
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2009, 10:38 am by Kedar
Justice Sotomayor lined up in exactly the position she was expected take and the same goes for each of the other eight Justices. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 7:53 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Rather each voted in line with her predecessor, preserving the court’s 5–4, formalist-pragmatist split on the Confrontation Clause.In Bullcoming, the Court reaffirmed (and arguably extended) its decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 7:35 am by Natasha Nguyen
An established line of European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) decisions, beginning with Leander v Sweden (1987) 9 EHHR 433, has confirmed that art 10 includes the right to receive information from others who wish to impart it. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 11:48 am
(Just like, I'll add, you definitely don't see a justice on the Court of Appeal quote a line from Star Trek's Spock in the opinion, which Justice Dato does in footnote 9 of his concurring opinion.) [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 4:30 am
"  which of these two opposing story lines will succeed in a legal fee / legal malpractice case. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 12:47 am by Sander van Rijnswou
The current status of the file is a deemed withdrawal, more than 18 years after the priority date.Summary of Facts and Submissions(...)V. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
A General Municipal Law §207-a(2) salary supplement becomes payable by the employer upon a firefighters retirement with accidental or line of duty disability benefitsMasullo v City of Mount Vernon, 2016 NY Slip Op 04225, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentThe Fire Commissioner of the City of Mount Vernon adopted the recommendation of a hearing officer, made after a hearing, and denied disabled firefighter Michael Masullo’s application for supplemental salary benefits… [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 1:14 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
’001 patent,col. 3, lines 45–46; id., col. 2, lines 29–30; see also id. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 5:10 pm
Viacom seeks to enjoin YouTube from distributing copyrighted works as well as to recover moneyary damages.Viacom Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 5:25 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
To view a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Matter of Walsh v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:21 am by Mathew Purchase, Matrix Chambers
This is a context in which a line must be drawn somewhere and it must be right that the Court was right to accord considerable respect to the assessment of Parliament as to where to draw it. [read post]