Search for: "S S V STATE OF MICHIGAN"
Results 3221 - 3240
of 6,430
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2007, 6:36 am
Michigan, 126 S. [read post]
28 Jan 2017, 9:57 am
See Hively v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 12:45 pm
Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action upheld Michigan’s Proposal 2, approved by the state’s voters in 2006 by a margin of fifty-eight to forty-two percent. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 12:00 am
Michigan, 516 US 442 (1996) (a court order forfeiting a jointly owned vehicle without making any provision for the interest of the innocent co-owner did not violate either Due Process or the federal Takings Clause); United States v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 10:01 pm
In today's decision in National Pork Producers v. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 6:29 am
For the reasons stated thereafter, we affirm the district court's rulings and deny all other relief requested. 07a0394p.06 2007/09/27 Amer Maritime v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 3:41 am
 The court cites Michigan v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:17 pm
Supreme Court issued an opinion in the case of Howes v. [read post]
12 Nov 2024, 1:46 pm
Abortion Rights Win in Trump Country Kohar/ACLU Thirteen states currently have total abortion bans in effect, but Missouri was the first state to enforce its ban, taking action mere minutes after the fall of Roe v. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 10:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied Ohio State University's petition for rehearing en banc in Snyder-Hill v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 1:02 pm
DiPiazza, No. 284946, vacating the trial court’s order denying defendant’s request to have his name removed from Michigan’s sex offender registry. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 2:08 pm
*Less well known than O'Connor's opening, less well known than they should be, are the opening paragraphs of Harry Blackmun's dissenting opinion (joined by Marshall and Stevens).Federalism; comity; state sovereignty; preservation of state resources; certainty: the majority methodically inventories these multifarious state interests before concluding that the plain-statement rule of Michigan v. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 10:30 pm
” However, the viability of this sort of statute was called into question in TransUnion Risk & Alternative Data Solutions v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 11:22 am
Warrior Sports v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 10:00 pm
See State v. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
LEXIS 97891 (WD MI, Dec. 3, 2008), a Michigan federal district judge affirmed a federal magistrate's order denying plaintiff prisoner's motion for appointment of counsel in a suit alleging free exercise and RLUIPA violations. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 12:20 pm
S. 438 (1928), overruled by Katz v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 7:30 am
However, her Title VII claim against the Assistant Secretary of State in his official capacity, as well as her Section 1983 and state law claims, were dismissed because of Eleventh Amendment immunity (Canfield v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 1:16 pm
Under this approach, the Sixth Circuit would consider itself bound by the one-sentence order in 1972’s Baker v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 3:45 am
The court cites Michigan v. [read post]
