Search for: "U.S. v. Mark" Results 3221 - 3240 of 11,356
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” At Lawfare, Ingrid Wuerth cautions that, when the court decides Jam v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Perhaps the SEC is referring outsider trading schemes to the U.S. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
Finally, we note that Mann J has now released an unredacted version of his 2015 judgment in Gulati v MGN [2015] EWHC 2732 (Ch) – the redactions were of the names of various Mirror Group journalists and editors and are marked on this version of the judgment. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 12:34 pm by Rachel Brown, Wenqing Zhao
Marco Rubio and Mark Warner sent a letter encouraging Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to “reconsider Huawei’s inclusion in any aspect of Canada’s 5G development. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 8:17 am by Andrew Hamm
In 1956, for example, 19 U.S. senators and approximately 80 congressmen joined forces to issue a document called the Southern Manifesto denouncing Brown as wrongly decided. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 6:08 am by Cheryl Beise
., the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board properly determined that the marks CORN THINS and RICE THINS were highly descriptive of their respective goods—”crispbread slices predominantly of corn, namely popped corn cakes” and “crispbread slices primarily made of rice, namely rice cakes”—and that Real Foods failed to prove that the marks had acquired distinctiveness among consumers, the U.S. [read post]