Search for: "X, Y "
Results 3241 - 3260
of 4,308
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2012, 10:04 am
Sec’y Dep’t of Health & Human Services, 1999 WL 778528 (Fed.Cl. 1999) Hennessey v. [read post]
25 Aug 2024, 11:58 am
So, if a genuinely concerned person with legitimate worry, or a busybody, or a keyboard warrior or a malicious person calls social services and says ‘hey social services, I think this child is at risk because x’, that triggers a statutory process. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 5:00 am
The AIPLA disfavors requiring Applicants to provide (x) a statement of novelty and (y) a description in the details concerning the application. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 8:40 am
It is based on the idea that state officials have to make countless discretionary decisions – give benefits to X and deny them to Y; kick in the door of Y’s house, not X’s; etc. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
Peu de temps après sa naissance, X a été confiée à l’appelante et au père, chez qui elle réside, et une requête pour ordonnance de placement en vue d’une adoption a été déposée. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
If I say “X should be allowed to say Y,” some might conclude that (a) I agree with X about Y, (b) I am causing harm to people who object to the saying of Y, or (c) I am an accomplice in the larger project in which X is engaged and of which saying Y is just one part.My view is that people should strive to speak the truth and be willing to listen to others speak the truth, even when it is unpleasant or even painful to hear. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 6:40 am
Knowing that only X equals Y saves a great deal of time and money arguing about the possibility that Z might also equal Y; it helps to improve the predictability of litigated outcomes; it depersonalizes disputes, insofar as it’s not anyone’s fault that X equals Y; and, it promotes settlement by limiting the available options and thus circumscribing litigants’ hopes and expectations. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
The intersection of race and education is a major flashpoint in the courts. [read post]
24 May 2012, 11:21 am
Professor Haack has been an unflagging critic of Daubert and its progeny. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 3:18 pm
Example 1: The label of a dietary supplement containing "X" uses the following claims: "The amino acid 'X' is the chemical precursor to nitric oxide. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 4:47 am
I sometimes hear the argument, "If the answer is X, then the professor should tell us the answer is X, and any classroom answer Y detracts from the point. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:00 am
This seemed to coincide roughly with the point at which late Gen X and early Gen Y law students started graduating. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 2:37 am
Die Lieferberechtigung des Grosshändlers, hier der Y. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 5:03 am
The president tells the leader of Y that (quid) he will veto any NATO action to counter Y's upcoming invasion of Z, as long as Y invests $100 million in a disinformation plan targeting the president's opponent in the upcoming election. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 1:31 pm
(If the subject of the offer hadn’t been a book, describing its features would be part of “merely” proposing a commercial transaction—proposing a transaction is more than “I’ll sell you X for $Y” and certainly includes factual claims about what the X on offer is.) [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 8:27 am
A World Without Privacy? [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 12:20 pm
So too with “{ City} { Practice Area} Lawyers 5.0 ***** Based on { X number of} reviews,” e.g., “Cotati Intellectual Property Lawyers 5.0 ***** Based on 5450 reviews. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 2:59 pm
The Horizontal X Axis: Political Commitments: Sovereignty and Liberal Internationalism Imagine a horizontal x axis labeled ‘political commitments’. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 5:13 am
Why “ought” we to believe “Y” if we believe “If X then Y” and “X. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 7:48 am
Imagine if someone took your family members and then told you to get them back, you had to give them X, Y, and Z, whatever it might be, and you were being advised, just give them X, Y, and Z anyway, without any promise that your family members would be released. [read post]
