Search for: "Harris v. Does"
Results 3261 - 3280
of 3,599
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2013, 5:05 pm
It is a truism oft repeated in the courts but what the public is interested in, does not necessarily make it in the public interest. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 2:00 am
Supreme Court settled, once and for all, that gender identity and sexual orientation are protected “sex-based” characteristics under federal law in the landmark case Bostock v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 2:55 pm
The new decision, in the case of Cooper v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 4:24 am
The evidence does not support the need for it. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 1:36 pm
In September 2005, the California Court of Appeal ruled in Foundation for Taxpayer & Consumer Rights v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:48 am
(Subscription required) — Texas Lawyer The lawyer’s role in protecting cybersecurity in the courts — Houston-based attorney Rachel V. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 9:12 pm
The Court’s decision in FDA v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 12:16 pm
What Does a Domestic Partnership Agreement Do? [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 6:08 am
"Well thank you Harry. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 9:28 am
Department of the Treasury, Treasury Designates Russian Oligarchs, Officials, and Entities in Response to Worldwide Malign Activity, supra. [6] Gardiner Harris, U.S. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 1:07 pm
Liberal lions Harry Blackmun, William Brennan, and Thurgood Marshall dissented. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 4:36 pm
(Applause.)Let me ask you: Are you ready to elect Kamala Harris and Tim Walz president and vice president of the United States? [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
Because at least for me, Trump does not enter office with a presumption of regularity in his work. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
And, most famously, in Obergefell v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 10:08 am
In a (Harry) Frankfurterian sense, it does not matter whether Long's statement is especially true or false about Sotomayor -- to Long, whether she knows it or not, or to anyone else. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 2:36 pm
One reason is the limited degree of uniformity created by the New York Convention which does not entirely eliminate differences between the national jurisdictions (especially in the context of arbitrability and public policy).11 The perspective of European law is different. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 3:52 am
(But does that make this dictum? [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:21 pm
Sellers, McCoy v. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 6:23 am
If the vote succeeds, then the rule does not go into effect. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am
What does your book add to the biographical mix and our understanding of Earl Warren? [read post]
