Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 3261 - 3280
of 40,644
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2010, 3:04 pm
In Snead v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 9:27 am
In Garvin v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 5:39 am
") AC34106 - State v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 4:00 am
In the words of the court, “Plaintiffs’ claims were frivolous from the outset and required the County Defendants to litigate continuously (at taxpayer expense) since March 2007,” explaining that the County Defendants did not employ, or supervise, the Plaintiffs and had no meaningful role in any alleged wrongs advanced by the Plaintiffs.* Plaintiffs brought their state law claims in state court, which dismissed all claims against the county at the… [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 12:39 pm
As well as in any other state with a similarly-worded statute. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 4:25 pm
I understand and appreciate that illegal entry in the United States is a crime, and that the defendant here is not extraordinarily sympathetic because he's previously been deported.But here, everyone agrees that this is what he did: "In 2019, Cabrera went to Tijuana and climbed one of two fences separating Mexico from the United States. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 8:00 am
Apparently the State Bar judge has recommended that Mr. [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 12:45 pm
In other words, when a state "affords a full judicial mechanism with which to challenge the administrative decision" in question, the state provides adequate procedural due process, id., whether or not the plaintiff avails him or herself of the provided appeal mechanism. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 2:01 am
Some say that a picture is worth a thousand words, and that is certainly true with regard to the TTABlog FRAUD-O-METER™ brand legal indicator. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 2:54 am
In Kunitsyna v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
First, the PHA states that a “person” may commit the criminal offence or be liable for the civil wrong of harassment (sections 1, 2 and 3). [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am
The “presumption of regularity” that attaches to all federal officials’ actions, United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 3:47 am
An modified version of the principles set out in Jeynes v News Magazines [2008] EWCA Civ 130, on establishing the meaning of words alleged to be defamatory, applies. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 8:24 am
The 2 great newspapers seem to be working off the same memo.Like the Times, WaPo notes that Biden avoided the word "abortion" in his State of the Union speech, but WaPo doesn't mention that the prepared text had the word, and WaPo is more upbeat about Biden's support for abortion, ending its article like this:“Those bragging about overturning Roe v. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 1:21 pm
Visa and Perfect 10 v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 3:03 pm
., v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 1:46 am
Also, note the use of the word 'likely'.]On the factsThe defendants had created a link, they had done so for commercial advantage and had done so with the intention of creating a link. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 11:54 am
In United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 7:38 am
” On this point, the court relied on its 1996 decision in Durling v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 8:20 am
An Extra Division of the Inner House decided that, interpreting the words of the provision in the statutory context, they did not create a duty on the Ministers to make regulations but were merely permissive: M v The Scottish Ministers [2011] CSIH 19, 2011 SLT 787. [read post]
