Search for: "Light v. State Bar"
Results 3281 - 3300
of 5,601
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2014, 4:47 pm
However, it remains to be seen where the court will fix the bar and to what extent it will be willing to become involved in a detailed assessment of evidence at an early stage in proceedings. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 2:23 pm
Sponsoring employers and administrators of cafeteria plans now have additional guidance from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) about when same-sex couples can be treated as spouses for purposes of Internal Revenue Code (Code) Section 125’s rules on cafeteria plans, including health and dependent care flexible spending arrangements (FSAs), and Code Section 223’s rules about health savings accounts (HSAs) following the Supreme Court decision declaring unconstitutional the Defense of… [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 12:28 am
In support of its position, the insurer relied on case law (including the Seventh Circuit’s 2001 opinion in Level 3 Communications Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 12:28 am
In support of its position, the insurer relied on case law (including the Seventh Circuit’s 2001 opinion in Level 3 Communications Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 2:43 pm
Rice argues that Plaintiff's claim is barred by the Supreme Court's decision in Heck v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 8:27 am
Bar is not particulaly high for many of these rules. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 11:08 pm
Railway v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 1:36 pm
I want to focus on the federal district court’s reasoning about why, in light of United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:20 am
Abbott Labs. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:11 am
In light of these various issues and complexities, the companies and investors who are not as concerned with trying to squeeze the best rate out of the banks seek to use a benchmark rate. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:48 am
Co. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:30 am
In light of these requirements, it is important to note that, despite the need for proof, the cost of proving the expenditures for computer research should not exceed the amount claimed (see: Almecon Industries Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 4:05 pm
These dangers are highlighted by the recent decision of the Alberta Court of Appeal in Lafarge Canada Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 5:57 am
Davidson and Jones, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
’” Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 4:30 am
At the end of 2013 we were greeted by a jolly, straightforward application of TwIqbal in Witt v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:02 pm
Plaintiff also stated that Defendant required her to dance at particular times. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 6:52 am
The Supreme Court’s framework for evaluating contract impairment claims involves a three-prong analysis announced in Energy Reserves Grp, Inc v Kansas Power & Light Co. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 1:28 pm
Indeed, standing alone, the documents shed no light on defendant's guilt or innocence as ruled in People v Damato and People v Bush. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 5:56 pm
Thirty years later, however, on June 25, 2012, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in Miller v. [read post]
