Search for: "MATTER OF J M J"
Results 3281 - 3300
of 5,063
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2012, 7:11 am
Even if it had been open to this court to consider the matter afresh, it would have rejected the claim in any event on the ground that the law relating to assisted suicide is an area of law where member states have a wide margin of appreciation and that in the UK this is a matter for determination by Parliament. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 1:57 am
Sweden, no. 12631/87); (j) timely decisions, backlog in the case load (Micallef v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 4:47 am
The Say-on-Golden Parachutes compensation disclosure (but not its advisory vote) is required in connection with other transactions, including Rule 13e-3 going-private transactions and third-party tender offers, so that the golden parachute compensation information is available for shareholders no matter the structure of the transaction. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm
England, Sandra M. [read post]
4 May 2017, 6:48 am
J. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 10:17 am
R.C. 2945.39(J), which was first enacted into the statute in 1997, clearly and strictly prohibits the use of a defendant’s statements from a compelled psychiatric examination on the issue of guilt, although the statute does permit the use of such testimony by the state for other matters. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 12:12 pm
Ct. 2116, 2133 (2019) (Gorsuch, J., dissenting). [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm
England, Sandra M. [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 4:04 pm
Last Week in the Courts The case of NT1 v Google was heard by Warby J on 27 and 28 February and 1 March 2018. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am
Circuit decision, which the IRS has since adopted into its regulations).[13] I'm not certain this is so; I think the Supreme Court may well conclude that this so-called "methodology" standard, like the "sufficiently full and fair exposition" standard, is so subjective as to provide too much room for deliberate or subconscious viewpoint discrimination.[14] But even if such a "methodology" test is sufficiently clear to be constitutional, it must be applied… [read post]
24 May 2015, 4:08 pm
On the same day Munby P handed down judgment in the case of In the matter of M (Children) ([2015] EWHC 1433 (Fam)) an important decision about the wardship jurisdiction and the ambit of “super-injunctions”. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:00 am
Family Law: Mediation; ConfidentialityAssociation de médiation familiale du Québec v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 11:22 am
M/s. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 4:29 am
I’m a New York kid. [read post]
27 May 2019, 12:39 pm
Here’s what happened in the case of Frances J. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 5:44 pm
The White House social media director, Dan Scavino, promotes @realDonaldTrump, @POTUS and @WhiteHouse equally as channels through which “President Donald J. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 2:39 pm
Tran & J. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 10:06 am
Gots, Arthur M. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:16 am
See, Elmasry M, Steinvall I, Thorfinn J, Abbas AH, Adly OA, Abdelrahman I, Nagi MA, Sjoberg F. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 12:00 pm
" What a lot of folks articulate is "I'm afraid of getting cancer. [read post]
