Search for: "Jackson v. State" Results 3301 - 3320 of 6,522
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2016, 6:00 pm by The Public Employment Law Press
Tripp, Esq., Jackson Lewis P.C.CARA users also may access all of the advanced research technology on Casetext. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
**Other decisions in which a public employee's right to free speech was considered include Tytor v Laramie County School District, CA10 [unpublished]; Jeffries v Harleston, CA2, 52 F3d 9; and Barnard v Jackson County, CA8, 43 F3d 1218. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
  On July 27, 2016, the Ohio Supreme Court issued its decision in Innkeeper Ministries, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
As the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California aptly explained in United States of America v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 8:06 am by Bill Marler
Over Recall” – following a Listeria recall linked to Estrella Family Creamery (See Inspection) and an E. coli O157:H7 outbreak linked to Sally Jackson Cheese (See Inspection) – both producers from the state of Washington. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 2:30 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
UMMC Report of Missing Laptop Leads To Multiple Charges & Resolution Agreement Mississippi’s sole public academic health science center, UMMC provides patient care in four specialized hospitals on the Jackson campus and at clinics throughout Jackson and the State as well as conducts medical education and research functions. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 7:01 am by Dan Ernst
Jackson Lecture on the Supreme Court of the United States at the Chautauqua Institution. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:10 am by Jeremy Saland
The Court stated: “[E]ven when taken together with all reasonable inferences which can be drawn from those facts (see People v Jackson, 18 NY3d 738, 747 [2012]), [it does] not give rise to the inference that defendant possessed the “forged” license with the knowledge and intent required by the Penal Law 170.20. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:10 am by Jeremy Saland
The Court stated: “[E]ven when taken together with all reasonable inferences which can be drawn from those facts (see People v Jackson, 18 NY3d 738, 747 [2012]), [it does] not give rise to the inference that defendant possessed the “forged” license with the knowledge and intent required by the Penal Law 170.20. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 10:45 am
The ACLU of Ohio challenged a set of protest restrictions passed by the city of Cleveland in Trump et al v. [read post]