Search for: "Matter of Rules Adoption" Results 3301 - 3320 of 22,063
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
They assert that “the choice to have such laws—or not to have them—is a matter for the states, subject to constitutional and statutory limitations. [read post]
4 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Just as Orwell’s warnings have come to life in many ways, some literal and some not quite, “The Handmaid’s Tale” is a story that communicates warnings about how power can be abused without necessarily being accurate about the specific types of abuses that might be visited on innocent people.The difference between an allegory and my conception of a pre-documentary, then, is essentially a matter of degree. [read post]
4 May 2022, 2:33 pm by Eugene Volokh
Musk becoming the sole owner of Twitter would be out of step with the ownership structures of other social media platforms or, for that matter, media companies generally. [read post]
4 May 2022, 9:40 am by Ramsi Woodcock
Any rule the FTC seeks to adopt, the FTC itself must follow; if a defendant can show that the firm complied, the FTC loses its case. [read post]
4 May 2022, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
  For more on rules, standards, and catalogs, see Legal Theory Lexicon 026: Rules, Standards, Principles, Catalogs, and Discretion. [read post]
3 May 2022, 5:37 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
” The implications of this ruling are therefore tremendous. [read post]
3 May 2022, 1:39 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The appellate court said that, as a threshold matter, the FFP did not involve any “state action,” a necessary element of any dormant Commerce Clause claim. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:05 am by Brian Finucane
This carefully lawyered memorandum distinguished between different types of legal obligations regarding the conduct of hostilities: on the one hand, rules binding generally under international law, including rules reflected in the provisions of Additional Protocol I; and on the other hand, rules applicable only to parties to Additional Protocol I as a matter of treaty law. [read post]
3 May 2022, 5:55 am by Justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa
They are silenced with the purpose, or effect, of stifling scrutiny and debate on matters of public importance. [read post]
2 May 2022, 1:48 pm by Jonathan M. Barnett
It is the competitive process, not the fortunes of particular competitors, that matters. [read post]
As we noted earlier this year, some jurisdictions (like Massachusetts) have refused to adopt the stringent “ABC” test in a joint employer analysis and instead adopted the FLSA standard, which focuses on the “totality of the circumstances. [read post]
2 May 2022, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
I don't understand him to be saying just that Obergefell is wrong as a matter of constitutional doctrine but rather it is not in the common good to extend marriage to same-sex couples. [read post]
2 May 2022, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
In determining whether or not a faculty should issue, the Chancellor adopted the  framework in Re St. [read post]
1 May 2022, 6:15 am by Lawrence Solum
Contexts in which Baselines Matter Baselines are important in a variety of contexts. [read post]
1 May 2022, 1:45 am by Frank Cranmer
In LF v SCRL [2022] EUECJ C‑344/20 (Opinion), Advocate General Medina suggests at [60] that “Article 8 of Directive 2000/78 must be interpreted as permitting Member States to adopt … autonomous protection as a means legitimately to determine, first, whether employees concerned by religious clothing obligations should not be placed, as a matter of principle, in a situation where they might need to choose between observing the obligations deriving… [read post]
30 Apr 2022, 4:26 pm by Sandy T. Fox
Although the general magistrate attempted to order a compromise, the appellate court ruled this was impermissible, as the plain language of the agreement controlled. [read post]
30 Apr 2022, 11:53 am by Eugene Volokh
Connecticut courts have also read this statute as borrowing into the statute two First Amendment principles developed by the Supreme Court as to government employee speech: (1) Speech is excluded from this protection if it's on a matter of merely "private concern. [read post]