Search for: "DOE DEFENDANT" Results 3321 - 3340 of 112,780
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2022, 5:01 am by Gabriel Schoenfeld
Congress, the Supreme Court, and the White House are defended by a variety of police forces, high-tech nonscalable fences, anti-ram car barriers and bollards, search points, x-ray screeners, and virtually every other security device known to man. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 11:47 am
The fact that the Association has been named in the lawsuit raises several questions: • What does “tendering the lawsuit” mean? [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 7:45 am by Docket Navigator
Ct. 1514 (2017), the court granted defendants' motions to transfer for improper venue and rejected plaintiffs' arguments that defendants waived their defense. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 7:06 am by Docket Navigator
The jury’s finding of willfulness does not relieve [plaintiff] of its obligation to mark or notify -- neither of which [plaintiff] did prior to [filing suit]. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 10:01 am by Steve Bainbridge
I was invited to participate in the NY Times Room for Debate on The Do-Gooder Corporation: Does the law allow corporations to pursue social goals over shareholder profits? [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 3:03 am by R. David Donoghue
Judge Lee granted various Doe defendants motion to sever their cases as unrelated, denied motions to quash subpoenas to the Doe’s ISPs and allowed Does to proceed anonymously at least through discovery in this BitTorrent copyright case. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 9:17 am by Steven Schwartzapfel
Here, a common question people have is, “How long does a lawsuit take? [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 1:23 pm
  The defendants are GoDaddy.com, LLC of Scottsdale, Ariz., Spirit Media of Phoenix, Ariz., Arthur Phoenix of Phoenix, Ariz. and John Does 1-5. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
  The court further determined that where, as in the case before it, an allegation does not clearly fall within an exclusion, the duty to defend (if not to pay) exists. [read post]
4 May 2011, 9:30 am by Shorstein & Lasnetski
If standing does not exist, the defendant will not be able to prevail on a motion to suppress evidence even if the search and the seizure were illegal. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 11:05 am by Mark Tabakman
It is not often when an employer defends a FLSA lawsuit by asserting that it is in an illegal business and therefore immune to suit. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by John Q. Prosecutor
State, the Supreme Court of Florida ruled that the Double Jeopardy Clause of the U.S. and Florida Constitutions does not apply when the defendant is convicted and punished for two… [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 10:26 pm
It does so by providing legal expertise to lawyers, judges, human rights defenders and other partners concerning... [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 6:21 am
NH: But does wealth mean a superior defense in capital murder cases, which can cost between $1 million and $3 million to defend? [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 8:01 am by Howard Knopf
 (Wikepedia)Another instalment in the mass litigation litany from the Aird and Berlis firm has now been released involving The Outpost - a 2020 picture.There are 841 "Doe" defendants. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 5:05 pm by Mirriam Seddiq
  This one does it for me.Go Public Defender Revolution. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 12:00 pm by Ezra Rosser
By Line Below: The Southern District of Georgia does remarkably little to provide for indigent defendants. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 8:08 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Constitution is violated when hearsay is "testimonial," admitted against a criminal defendant, and the hearsay declarant does not testify at... [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 6:00 am
The Ohio Supreme Court today clarified that the “jurisdictional priority” rule does not apply to two cases filed in the same division of the same court, and that the case in which a defendant is first properly notified is the case that moves forward. [read post]
28 May 2010, 1:07 am
The Supreme Court of Ohio today ruled that a state statute, which the city of Cleveland contended permitted a criminal trial in the absence of the defendant, does not apply to criminal trials against corporations in municipal court initiated by affidavit or complaint. [read post]