Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF T W" Results 3321 - 3340 of 8,735
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2017, 4:17 am by SHG
And anyone who isn’t is just a racist anyway, so they don’t get a say. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 9:22 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
"[T]he test forsufficiency is whether the disclosure of the application relied upon reasonably conveys to thoseskilled in the art that the inventor had possession of the claimed subject matter as of the filingdate. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 4:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  As for commercial speech, “[w]here the facts present a close question, ‘strong support’ that the speech should be characterized as commercial speech is found where the speech is an advertisement, the speech refers to a particular product, and the speaker has an economic motivation. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 6:40 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
It doesn’t matter if your extra income is from driving a car or trading stocks, income is reportable unless it’s otherwise excluded. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 1:11 pm by Glen C. Hansen
On September 19, 2016, California Governor Jerry Brown signed Senate Bill 1383 (Lara, 2016 Stats., ch. 395), which is designed to address short-lived climate pollutants (“SLCPs”), including methane gas. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 10:33 am by Eugene Volokh
In the face of the clear infringement on free exercise before us, that interest cannot qualify as compelling … “[T]he state interes [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 3:18 pm by Jon Katz
Don’t let evil triumph in this case, find [the defendant] guilty of first degree murder. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 4:16 am by Ron Coleman
 And as a matter of law the PTO can’t register two marks that are likely to be confused. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 7:30 am
Our clients were among more than 100 men officially known to have been abducted and detained by the CIA in a network of secret prisons during the George W. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Monday 19 June, the Supreme Court will hear the appeals of R v M; R v C; R v T. [read post]
17 Jun 2017, 7:10 am
DeGenero, supra.The court then explained that`[r]aising the question of whether the evidence is legally sufficient to support the * * * verdict as a matter of law invokes a due process concern. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
In fact, the overwhelming weight of economic evidence shows that Republican-style tax cuts do not increase economic growth.This is not, moreover, a matter of warring ideological camps of economists reading the evidence in different ways. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 5:14 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
The Court reasoned: [T]he relevant inquiry is not whether [decedent] was actually still intoxicated when he spoke with Officer Sanders. [read post]