Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 3321 - 3340
of 4,554
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2012, 1:30 pm
We have applied the standards of the Army Field Manual to all interrogations conducted by the federal government in the context of armed conflict. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 12:52 pm
Real government debt has increased by an average of 86 percent after three year....Historical experience is that V-shaped recoveries in equity prices are far more common than V-shaped recoveries in real housing prices or employment. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:58 pm
One strongly suspects that most people who become journalists do so precisely because they want to fulfil this kind of role in society. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 1:18 pm
In EEOC v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:23 am
See Wilson v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 7:54 am
I think, then, we will have a clearer idea of how to frame those questions more precisely with respect to a particular artificial agent and a particular factual scenario. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 9:02 pm
In the case of United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:47 pm
As the Supreme Court explained in US v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
This latter rule, by incorporation of R 41(2)(c), defines the standard formal administrative items of information required to fill out the notice of appeal, which will permit the identification of the appellant. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 5:41 am
`To meet the standard for probable cause, the warrant affidavit must set forth some nexus between the evidence to be seized and the locations to be searched. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 5:44 am
More precisely, Cray argued that the district court judge erred in allowing the Government's expert to testify to inadmissible hearsay data relating to the geographic location of IP addresses. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 11:26 pm
That would likely reduce the Jarndyce v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 2:33 pm
The recent decision of the US Supreme Court in United States v Jones has brought one particular form of surveillance of suspected individuals to the fore in public debate, namely the use of global positioning surveillance (GPS). [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 5:44 am
Cameron v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 2:03 pm
Richard Gardiner, however, points out that “titles are often too general to provide precise guidance. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 8:24 am
I’ve just finished reading the fascinating case of AMP v Persons Unknown [2011] EWHC 3454 (TCC) via the IP Osgoode blog. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
In Golan v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:45 am
Swiss Watch International, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 9:32 am
This is precisely what the Plaintiff, Sandra Jones, did in the Ontario Court of Appeal in Jones v. [read post]
