Search for: "State v. Davis"
Results 3321 - 3340
of 5,690
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2015, 6:12 am
Pope Francis’s visit to the United States once again dominates Court-related news. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 pm
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, V. vulnificus bloodstream infections are fatal in about half of cases. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 11:06 am
That question was answered in 1936, by the Beaumont Court of Appeals in the case, Love et al. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:34 pm
The applicable statute of limitations, borrowed from state law, was four years. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:07 am
Davis, when it is plausible that the failure to investigate that aspect of petitioner’s background on state postconviction review could, given substantial authority recognizing counsel’s duty to do so, excuse the procedural default of an ineffective assistance of trial counsel claim. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 4:15 am
Stone, 2 Cir., 429 F.2d 138, 140; United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 12:00 am
Perhaps unsurprisingly, a federal court sent his hostile work environment claim under Title VII to trial (Davis v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 10:43 pm
Other cases of note includes yet another grant of relief in Arizona on aggravating factor (F)(6) (heinousness, cruelty, and depravity) in State v. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 3:01 pm
In the recent case of Klar v. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 10:26 am
Eugene Davis joined in it. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 12:39 pm
State Bar Director Christy Amuny of Beaumont and Granbury attorney Cindy V. [read post]
31 Jul 2010, 8:34 am
Davis, 598 F.3d 1259 (11th Cir. 2010); State v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 1:21 pm
Davis, 17-6883 Issue: Whether — when the U.S. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 7:30 am
However, according to Davis v. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 12:19 pm
” Davis v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 7:09 am
See, e.g., Davis v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 8:04 am
” After various facts played out and an unhappy client sued, said the Court: “‘An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of a retainer (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428 [2007]). [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 7:18 pm
In Judge Davis's original order, he stated that he was contemplating granting a new trial based on a possible error in Jury Instruction No. 15. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 7:42 am
Safa Enterprises Inc. v. [read post]
