Search for: "John Does 1- 5"
Results 3341 - 3360
of 5,764
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Cullen & Linda Rosenstock, “Principles and Practice of Occupational and Environmental Medicine,” chap. 1, in Linda Rosenstock & Marc Cullen, eds., Textbook of Clinical Occupational and Environmental Medicine 1, 13-14 (Phila. 1994); David F. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 12:07 am
After converting its third slaughter plant to process only pigs not fed the additive, Smithfield Foods announced last month that it would be 50 percent ractopamine-free by June 1. [read post]
31 May 2013, 6:33 pm
NOTES:[1] W. [read post]
31 May 2013, 12:15 pm
But does spelling matter? [read post]
31 May 2013, 12:15 pm
But does spelling matter? [read post]
29 May 2013, 10:07 am
Prenda Law is the copyright “troll” firm that gained fame for sending suing thousands of “John Doe” BitTorrent users identified by only IP address and, after obtaining their identities from their ISPs, would threaten them with a lawsuit if they did not pay up. [read post]
28 May 2013, 11:57 pm
A busy (and clueless) Bruno while trying to get a clue about royalty payment schemes The kernel of the nine questions was Question 8: If the scheme can deliver the smallest individual artist royalty payment at $50, with a 10 per cent administration fee of $5, why does the scheme charge an administration fee of $1 000 to deliver an individual royalty payment of $10 000? [read post]
28 May 2013, 7:21 pm
Why does it take a disruptive competitor to give consumers new services they want? [read post]
26 May 2013, 6:58 pm
May 3-5, 2013. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:11 pm
John Doe 5 Related Case: Malibu Media LLC v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 8:01 am
Prenda Law became a well known copyright “troll” for suing large groups of “John Doe” defendants accused of infringing copyrights on BitTorrent. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:55 pm
Yoo, John H. [read post]
22 May 2013, 1:28 pm
Prenda, previously, had attempted to sue thousands of “John Doe” defendants identified only by their IP address but, when some defendants fought back, it was revealed that the organizations Prenda was supposedly representing were, most likely, shell companies for the lawyers themselves. [read post]
21 May 2013, 10:33 am
My rebuttal of Rawls is more nearly on the level of "his argument assumes that 2+2=5." [read post]
20 May 2013, 12:12 pm
The numbers come out thus: Active Judges Republican -- 4 Democratic -- 3 Senior Judges Republican -- 5 Democratic -- 1 Total Judges Republican -- 9 Democratic -- 4 If Blawgletter has added right, the D.C. [read post]
20 May 2013, 6:00 am
Distinctions Concerning the Target of Surveillance and/or His Interlocutors 1. [read post]
19 May 2013, 10:05 pm
For example, I love being able to quickly say "send a message to my wife that I am running 5 minutes late" or "remind me when I get to work to call John Doe" or "add milk to my grocery list" and have the iPhone instantly obey using the Messages and Reminders apps. [read post]
16 May 2013, 9:01 pm
Another UK scholar, John B. [read post]
15 May 2013, 2:01 pm
But so does very nearly everyone else. [read post]
13 May 2013, 9:53 am
The IP addresses were sued as “John Doe” defendants by AF Holdings, a company based on the island of Nevis that is known for suing suspected pirates of their owned films in a bid to obtain their information and attempt to procure quick settlements. [read post]
