Search for: "MATTER OF T F"
Results 3341 - 3360
of 13,719
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
National/Federal A Conspiracy of Hunches: Roger Stone trial set to start this week San Francisco Chronicle – Devlin Barrett, Spencer Hsu, and Manuel Roig-Franzia (Washington Post) | Published: 11/4/2019 Roger Stone is on trial in federal court, where prosecutors plan to dive back into an episode of political chicanery, alleged lies, and conspiratorial texts that parallels the nascent impeachment inquiry into his longtime friend President Trump. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:34 pm
This post summarizes opinions issued by the Court of Appeals of North Carolina on November 5, 2019. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:30 am
That, he contends, is the end of the matter. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 5:02 am
[T]he trial court awarded legal and physical custody of H.C. to the Grandparents and visitation to the Mother …. [1.] [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 10:19 am
But there's an express exception in the CFAA for law enforcement investigations, 18 U.S.C. 1030(f), so the CFAA probably couldn't limit such a query. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 5:07 am
Soto-Alvarez, 958 F.2d 473 (1st Cir. 1992) (Jeopardy does not attach to charges that are dismissed and “on which no finding of guilty is made. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 10:50 am
Alston, ___ F.3d ___, 2019 WL 5440084 (Oct. 24, 2019). [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 5:01 am
Leavell, 220 F.3d 562, 568 (7th Cir. 2000) ("[I]t should go without saying that the judge's opinions and orders belong in the public domain. [read post]
2 Nov 2019, 5:29 am
[Lawsuits are matters of public record -- and you generally can't hide them from prospective business partners, employers, house buyers, or others.] [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
’” In other words, said the court, “[i]f the speaker is not wearing her hat ‘as a citizen,’ or if she is not speaking ‘on a matter of public concern,’ then the First Amendment does not protect her. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 11:27 am
KAZ USA, Inc., 725 F. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:59 am
In 1974, Archibald Cox, the special prosecutor in the Watergate scandal and the victim of the 1973 Saturday Night Massacre, wrote that “[i]f the Executive Branch were left to itself, the practice [of executive privilege] would surely grow” because “[s]ecrecy, if sanctified by a plausible claim of constitutional privilege, is the easiest solution to a variety of problems. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 2:00 am
They keep the same level of precision and fairness, no matter how many candidates you need to prescreen. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
Robert F. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 12:12 pm
The campaign didn’t send a counternotice since the ad wouldn’t have been restored for two weeks, and elections run at such a fast pace that campaign officials decided a counternotice wasn’t worth the effort. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 7:35 am
For this post, we read eleven of the leading scholarly works on impeachment so that you don’t have to. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 7:10 am
§ 1252(f)(1), which doesn’t allow courts, other than the Supreme Court, to have jurisdiction to “enjoin or restrain the operation” of §§ 1221-1232 except with respect to an individual immigrant, prohibiting federal courts from issuing classwide injunctions. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:12 pm
However, “[i]f the project may have significant effects, but mitigation measures will make the effects insignificant, the agency may adopt a mitigated negative declaration. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 11:05 am
Schopp, 938 F.3d 1053 (2019), decision available here. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
But in this preliminary, pre-discovery procedural posture, the court declines to rule as a matter of law that it is not. [read post]
