Search for: "Held v. State" Results 3361 - 3380 of 82,195
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2008, 11:00 am
June 12th marks the anniversary of the US Supreme Court’s 1967 decision in the civil rights case Loving v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 7:04 am by Howard Friedman
Ct., May 13, 2020), the Wisconsin Supreme Court in a 4-3 decision held that the state's Safer at Home order is unenforceable because it exceeds statutory authority and was not adopted in accordance with required rulemaking procedures. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 10:20 am by Howard Friedman
The Supreme Court held that FISA does not displace the state secrets doctrine, but did not resolve the parties disagreement about the interpretation of the relevant portion of FISA, nor did it decide whether the district court was correct in dismissing the suit on the pleadings. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
Otherwise stated, whether the article means that – as stated in the headline – the claimant was one of two found “guilty of killing a woman while racing their cars”. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 1:00 pm by Dykema
On September 29, 2016, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in the matter of Expressions Hair Design et al. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 3:38 pm by William Weinberg
SUPREME COURT RULES THAT DUI BLOOD TEST REQUIRES A WARRANT On June 23, 2016, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in the case Birchfield v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 3:38 pm by William Weinberg
SUPREME COURT RULES THAT DUI BLOOD TEST REQUIRES A WARRANT On June 23, 2016, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in the case Birchfield v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:26 am by Anita Davies
There is some authority on this point from the United States. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 11:39 am by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
Additionally, the court held it would be unfair to require the accident victim to pursue two different cases against the same defendant in both state and federal court. [read post]
5 May 2016, 12:34 pm by Ted Max
In August 2015, the United States Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals held in Varsity Brands, Inc.. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 2:08 pm
"The decision does not state how such conduct should be described in an indictment, [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 11:22 am by Ackerman Law Office
In Harris v Quinn 573 U.S. ___ (2014) the court held that the First Amendment prohibits a State from forcing non-union members to pay for union speech on matters of public concern. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 8:17 am by Ted Frank
Kentucky state law bans lobbyists from giving to state legislative campaigns, but the state legislative ethics commission decided that an incident involving a Kentucky senator's aides asking lobbyists for money was an innocent mistake that did not warrant discipline. [read post]