Search for: "AC v. State"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,872
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2019, 3:49 am
This case (R v Gold & Schifreen (1988) 1 AC 1063) resulted in the Computer Misuse Act 1990. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:09 am
Co., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 10:00 am
The House unanimously dismissed his appeal (see R (Wellington) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 72; [2009] 1 AC 335.) [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 2:40 pm
Even if the tariff comes in at $20 per head, that’s more than five times the apparent rate in the USA.While the details of the AC blanket license and the CCC license may differ, the overall bottom line is that a university license in the USA costs only as a small fraction of what AC is demanding. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 12:30 pm
The offense to which he had pleaded guilty: filing false income tax returns using confidential ACS client information to fraudulently claim entitlement to state and local tax credits.The Appellate Division said: "We find that the arbitrator's award, which determined that while grievant had engaged in a censurable course of conduct that justified punishment he should be restored to his supervisory position at ACS, is irrational and defies common sense. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 2:02 am
The test in Bonnard is a much higher threshold than in claims for interim injunctions in privacy claims, where the applicant only need establish that his claim is more likely than not to succeed at trial (Cream Holdings Ltd v Banerjee ([2005] AC 253). [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm
This is a Norwich Pharmacal order, named for the case in which it was first granted (see Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133, [1973] UKHL 6 (26 June 1973); see also The Rugby Football Union v Consolidated Information Services Ltd [2013] 1 All ER 928, [2012] 1 WLR 3333, [2012] UKSC 55 (21 November 2012)), and the Supreme Court has affirmed that it forms part of Irish law (see Megaleasing v Barrett (No 2) [1993] ILRM 497; Ryanair… [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 1:52 pm
In Why Nada Cruz, LLC v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:41 pm
Friends of the Kings River v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 4:00 am
By Eric SegallTwenty years ago, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the following in Grutter v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 7:41 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 1:51 am
In summary, the dealing requirement is part of the ratio of OBG v Allan [2008] 1 AC 1 and no good or sufficient reason has been shown why the Court should depart from the relatively recent decision of the House of Lords in OBG in accordance with the 1966 Practice Statement. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 6:19 am
This rule as applied in Nigeria – often referred to as the Mocambique rule – is derived from the English case of British South Africa Company v Companhia de Mocambique [1893] AC 602. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 4:09 pm
“Likely” in this context normally means “more likely than not”, though a lesser prospect of success may suffice where the Court needs a short time to consider evidence/argument, or where the adverse consequences of publication might be extremely serious: Cream Holdings Ltd v Banerjee [2005] 1 AC 253 [16]-[23] (Lord Nicholls); ABC v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 2329 [2019] EMLR 5 [16]. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 7:30 am
He applied his Guidance on the Identification of the Ordinary Residence of People in Need of Community Care Services, England, which purported to apply the House of Lords judgment in R v Barnet LBC, ex parte Shah [1983] 2 AC 309 and Turner J’s judgment in R v Waltham Forest, ex parte Vale The Times, 25 February 1985. [read post]
20 May 2013, 6:35 am
Viggiano v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 5:46 pm
The Upper Tribunal has handed down judgment in the case of Raed Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department IA/21/21631/2011. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
Wade y acá Doe v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 3:31 am
In Alden v Maine, 527 US 706, the Supreme Court of the United States found that State sovereign immunity is "implicit in the constitutional design. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 3:00 am
In Fischer v. [read post]
