Search for: "Behrend, Behrend "
Results 321 - 340
of 372
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2012, 6:48 am
” See also Behrend v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 6:51 am
Behrend to argue against Rule 23(b)(3) certification of the proposed damages subclass. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 2:46 pm
Behrend, 133 S. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 7:06 am
Behrend, 569 U.S. 27, 34 (2013)). [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 6:28 am
The Ninth Circuit panel went on to explain that after Dukes and Comcast Corp. v Behrend, which expanded on the notion of individualized determinations and due process, circuit courts have consistently held that “statistical sampling and representative testimony are acceptable ways to determine liability so long as the use of these techniques is not expanded into the realm of damages. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 7:31 am
Behrend and Wal-Mart v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 8:12 am
Behrend to address the question but ultimately found it was not preserved for review.[5] The court then considered the Sixth Circuit’s statements on the subject. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 4:55 am
Behrend, 569 U.S. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 7:27 pm
Behrend, 133 S. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 11:43 am
Behrend, 133 S. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
Behrend. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 11:51 am
In Oxford Health Plans, LLC v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm
Behrend, 11-864. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 6:40 am
Behrend, 133 S. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 11:07 am
Behrend, the justices held that the lower courts were wrong to certify a class of cable-television subscribers in an antitrust lawsuit against the cable company because the subscribers could not show that their damages could be measured on a classwide basis. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am
Behrend, 11-864, as the Term’s most-relisted grant. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:52 pm
Behrend (relisted six times before grant). [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:11 am
Behrend the absence of a showing that injury can be proved on a classwide basis precludes class certification under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3); and (2) whether at the class certification stage of litigation a district court must analyze the admissibility of expert testimony under the standards set forth in Daubert v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 8:06 am
Behrend, 133 S. [read post]
