Search for: "Doe Defendant Five" Results 321 - 340 of 15,366
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2017, 5:17 am by Dominic Simon
It was filed in 2014 and the five-year period had not elapsed. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 4:38 am by Cyberleagle
Unless that threshold is surmounted, the platform does not have to remove it. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 10:21 am by Zoe Tillman
An FDA spokeswoman has said the agency does not comment on pending litigation. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 8:34 am by Legal Profession Prof
The Kentucky Supreme Court reinstated the judgment of conviction of an attorney 'with extensive experience in the practice of criminal law" who was convicted of failure to file five years of state tax returns. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 10:43 am by Jessica Smith
Recently a caller asked: Does the fact that the defendant was found in possession of goods five days after they were stolen create an inference that he stole them? [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 8:51 am by Justin Marceau
” Shumsky responded to this practical approach of counting votes and predicting how a case would be decided by noting that, at least as currently articulated, the Marks rule does not purport to create binding precedent out of a dissent. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 12:08 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
The FDA sent a warning letter and defendants discontinued sales. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
(And check the sign-up stats for the free “2017 Employment Law In Review” webinar I’m hosting on December 7, 2017, from 12-1 pm EST with five of the top employment-law bloggers in the universe. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 8:10 am by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Brack of New Mexico — having sentenced 6,708 defendants in just the last five years. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 8:25 am by Law Office of James J. Falcone
A common belief is that to claim adverse possession of real property, all one has to do is pay five years of overdue property tax, and take possession of the property. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 8:22 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Of course, the accident does nothing to explain the presence of a crack pipe on the driver's floor mat. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:10 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
A new hearing does not necessarily imply a different outcome. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 8:11 am by Marty Lederman
  Windsor herself has argued that Section 3 does not pass muster even on rational-basis review (see pages 32-62 of her brief), and the United States has argued (see pp. 52-53 of its brief) that Section 3 at a minimum does not pass muster under Justice O’Connor’s conception (in Lawrence) of the “more searching form of rational basis review” the Court has applied in cases such as Romer, Cleburne, and Moreno.) [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 12:58 pm by familoo
This : “but how CAN you defend a rapist? [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 12:48 pm by James Hughes
Relation to state law Significantly, Congress took pains in drafting the Act to clearly state that the DTSA does not preempt existing state law. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 9:28 am
  The statute does say that you've got to give the surety notice once you forfeit a bond in open court. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 10:40 am by Melinda Ghilardi
§ 3583(e), that District Courts should consider a defendant’s medical and rehabilitative needs in assessing whether to revoke supervised release and the duration of imprisonment that is appropriate upon revocation.Doe pleaded guilty to possession with intent to deliver five grams or more of crack cocaine and was sentenced to 30 months imprisonment followed by 4 years of supervised release, the terms of which provided that Doe may not possess or use a controlled… [read post]